|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Ferru93 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Ferru93  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III RXD Pros: Sharpness, blurry, price, weight, size Cons: Build quality more like the Sony than the Zeiss Opinion: I bought it practically at day One, I've been using it for a few days and I'm finding it really well. The lens is very nice aesthetically, the materials are good but not from that omnipotent style Zeiss feeling. The sharpness is something monstrous, from the center to the edges, from F 2.8 to F11 (more I have not yet tried), from the minimum focal to the maximum, really a blade. The colors are very faithful, the distortion is present a bit ' at all focal lengths but as soon as the update of Lightroom will be a matter of a click. It is impressive the minimum focus distance, it practically goes to touch the subject with the lens making possible even some macro style shots, which if combined with the high resolution of Sony allows to have a ratio of almost 1:1. Fast and always responsive autofocus (like the Zeiss 35 and the 55 Zeiss), the Eye Af is accurate and fast. The bokeh is very delicate and pleasant, not at all nervous. The lens hood is small and comfortable, the zoom ring is a little hard, we hope it will not be out over time while the manual focus is very smooth. Great lens, kudos to Tamron! sent on June 03, 2018 |
 | Sony FE 24-70mm f/4 ZA OSS Vario Tessar T* Pros: Sharpness, Handyman, More than enough the 24mm wide-angle side, Fast autofocus Cons: Weight Opinion: I like this lens very much, has a good sharpness, a good fixed aperture of f4 and the size is not excessive.rnGenerally use a 35 2.8 that I keep glued to my Sony but when I need a different perspective comes to help this 24 70 Zeiss. Good 70 mm for the portrait and good 24 mm to get everything in the frame. The sharpness is excellent on all focal lengths, f4 is not this monster of brightness but thanks to the ISO of the A7r2 you can photograph even in low light without too much noise.rnThe only flaw is the weight compared to 35 2.8 there is truly an abyss of difference.rnPreso used at 500 euros, of course at the price at which it is sold is not worth it! sent on January 22, 2018 |
 | Sony FE 85mm f/1.8 Pros: Light and sharp, beautiful colors Cons: They could include an objective lens bag Opinion: The lens is aesthetically beautiful and I really like it, with a feeling of cleansing and smooth. Very beautiful, light and beautiful colors. Maybe a bit high in price but all in line with the lenses of other homes. the colors he returns are faithful and the blur is very very uniform. I really like it because of a clear cut between the subject and the background (thanks to the full frame sensor and the wide opening of the diaphragm). Now I use only the 35 2.8 Samyang and this Sony 85 1.8 and I think I've got the coupled winning for my way of photographing. sent on October 18, 2017 |
 | Sony A7r II Pros: Compactness, constructive quality, great feel of touch. Bestial sensor, operating speed, precision, image quality. Cons: Battery. Opinion: I was presented with the opportunity to buy this car at a ridiculous price (after selling my Dx kit) and I could not resist it. rnThe car is really great in everything, beautiful to see and touch, great grip, great videos, great photos and great hold on iso. At 25600 ISO, the car performs well, allowing you to make great night shots without a closed diaphragm stand. This machine allows you to make very sharp trimmings while maintaining high quality. The files are very heavy and for this you need a good computer if you want to do post production. rnConsider this machine to those who want extreme quality and size, as long as you build a kit of fixed and light optics. For example, my kit: 35 2.8 + 50 1.7 + 85 1.8. sent on September 22, 2017 |
 | Samyang FE 35mm f/2.8 AF Pros: Light, sharp, very good manual ring ring, very beautiful aesthetically. Cons: Continuous fire that does not work well, not tropicalized. Opinion: The optics are fantastic, economical, lightweight, nice to the touch and sight and above all it's really clear! The continuous fire does not work well, but I notice that if you set face and face detection on your eyes, it improves things a bit! It's great in the videos. I bought it because I did not spend twice on the Zeiss. Fantastic! sent on September 12, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 16-80mm f/2.8-4 E ED VR Pros: Sharpness, fast AF, Bright colors, awesome bokeh for an all-purpose zoom and lightness. Cons: Hood uncomfortable, not weather sealed. Opinion: Bought a few days ago, I did test shots and I must say I was very surprised, positively. I looked at a lot of reviews and photos made by users before buying it since it's not exactly cheap. I found 700 online and I took a chance. rnSono especially surprised by the sharpness and bokeh, which is really impressive for a zoom. A 80mm f 4 really gives a bokeh with a creamy and nice blurred to watch, prenso it's a great alternative for ritrattti.rnIl then Vr is really effective, the old 16-85 did not help me that much, but this is really migliorato.rnL'AF combined with my D7200 is a splinter, I dare not imagine what on D500! sent on April 07, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
