|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Kktdisc www.juzaphoto.com/p/Kktdisc  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF 85mm f/1.4 D Pros: dreamy images, lightness, robustness, ergonomics Cons: AF not lightning, Flares (especially at night) difficult to manage Opinion: Do you want to do portraits or do plastic surgeons? in the first case 85 1.4d is your choice, alternatively there is the world, starting from the equivalent 85 sigma art. The old man at Nikon's house is not a toe and snap lens. it must be known, interpreted. but once you take the measurements, it gives enormous satisfaction, unless you shoot with hard lights and points on the pitch. In these cases, you have to arm yourself with patience and fix the flares that are popping up everywhere. not an easy optics, therefore, but a specific perspective for specific things, portraits, a field in which, in my personal opinion, is unparalleled. I also did some landscape, with the slab and adapter filters, but this... it's another speech! sent on January 21, 2020 |
 | Tamron SP 15-30mm f/2.8 Di VC USD G2 Pros: Fast and quiet autofocus, constant aperture 2.8, flares resistance, sharpness Cons: Very expensive filters, footprint and weight Opinion: Frankly, for what it costs is not rivals. If you then start to find a good used, the value for money assumes epic proportions. What I tried, Nikon attack, competes directly with the Sacred monster 14-24 f2.8. Tried both. The Tamron is a colder skin but distorts less. It is a more contrasting and less "Pastelloso" Pelino. On the opening of the shadows I have not caught big differences. The side coma is much more contained on the Tamron than the Nikon mom lens. At night, the Nikon is a little brighter than the Tamron, I would say almost 1/3 stop (which for astrophotography is not cheap). The ACE in the sleeve that, for someone could move the needle of the scale, is stabilization. With my hand (with hints of Parkinson's) I arrived to take perfectly sharp pictures at 1/8. With the Nikon is unthinkable. Therefore, in the street, no doubt the confrontation is inclement in favor of Tamarrozzo (for the form). Stabilization apart, none of the previous differences does not find solution in post production, so it remains to compare tastes and personal portfolios es imagine the main use. If you make Astro as if there were no tomorrow, go on the 14-24, otherwise with the savings you buy two lenses instead of one. I also think it appropriate to report a major shift focus on the Tamron. Once focused, changing focal, you need to focus again. On the Nikon zoom instead, everything works as expected. sent on April 18, 2019 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
