Reviews written by Nikywolf78

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Nikywolf78
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Nikywolf78

PROFILE

ALL PHOTOS

GALLERIES

Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Nikywolf78

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm f/1.8

Pros: sharpness and bokeh. autofocus speed. lightness. EXCELLENT optical quality. Compared with 85 f / 1.8 on full frame it does not make me regret absolutely full frame system, indeed ....! With 85 Canon can not I get the same definition and nitidezza.rn

Cons: I would rather have an AF ring that allowed the transition from AF-S to M simply by moving the focus ring forward or backward. The optical quality seems poor relying only on the optical tactile feeling

Opinion: I bought this lens because everyone says is a must-have remained enthusiastic m4 / 3.rnSono system of AF speed and lightness of lente.rnOttima sharpness already at TA. The bokeh is pleasant though not comparable to that of a full-frame (but do not know can have the same things as these are different systems) .rnNon I never thought that a lens so small I would be able to get a quality as well eccelsa.rnPeccato for the lack of the lens hood in the package. I've purchased separately original and does his duty.

sent on September 23, 2016

Olympus PEN-F

Pros: vintage appearance. Portability when compared to a full frame SLR (I have a Canon 5D mkIII). EVF fantastic and well defined.

Cons: Delicate the lower body, so I decided to buy the original handle ECG4. The ring of exposure compensation is likely to be changed inadvertently, it happened to me a few times. AF-C is not as reactivity comparable to that of a reflex.

Opinion: I possess an excellent kit Canon full-frame with 5DmkIII + optical zoom L series (17-40 - 24-70 f / 2,8II - 70-200 f / 4 IS) + 85 and 35 fixed and I was looking for a compact portable system you always behind without turning with the backpack to get it all back. rnHo decided, therefore, to buy a mirrorless body indirizzandomi of Olympus as it has stabilized bodies and the M4 / 3 because I wanted maximum portability and compattezza.rnInizialmente I was directed to the OM-D EM5 mkII, but I wanted something other than a-like SLR. So I decided for the new PEN F.rnSono was immediately impressed by the quality of the images that produces the sensor even at high ISO (1000-3200). To exceed the ISO 6000 the noise invalidates the definition and the general level of the picture is just sufficiente.rnNaturalmente has a different reaction time by reflex, but it is not a limit. You have to learn to handle different times and remember not to have on hand a reflex.rnL'AF-S is accurate and the coverage is almost totale.rnL'AF-C works but withtimes of mirrorless that are not those of relex. RNLA battery lasts a couple of hundreds of shots, because sometimes you get lost in the management of the machine through the menu and resource consumption in autonomia.rnLa council with the original handle, as it provides a good grip, the perfectly balance and it protects the lower body from scratches that are inevitable simply placing the machine on tavolo.rnHo preferred to use only fixed (currently shooting with 17, 45 and 75) and I must admit that these lenses are well defined.

sent on September 23, 2016