|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Frenki www.juzaphoto.com/p/Frenki  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EOS R6 Pros: Photo side is much, much better than the R and much better than the 5d4, cameras that I've had long enough. Video side is similar to the R, so very good, with the same possibilities of customizing buttons. In addition there is the Ibis that I have yet to understand well. Cons: The only con I see now is that it gives you the feeling of being much more "cheap" than the R, less refined. You feel the same thing going from a 5d4 to a 6d2 Opinion: I took it too little to say anything specific, but... the af and the burst remind me so much of a muted 1dx :D Photographically, it's light years ahead of the 5 series reflexes, even ahead of the old 1dx. The file is the canon one, usual colors, more or less the same dynamic range of R and 5d4, in short, is a beautiful beast. In my opinion it is great for those like me who have to go from sport to theater and in the middle make a web series in the mountains. sent on September 04, 2020 |
 | Canon EF 35mm f/2 IS USM Pros: Among the pros is certainly the lightness does not seem so great to see him but the goal, while very solid and very well built, it is definitely very light, not much heavier than the 50 1.4 it replaced. Sharpness already wide open, fuzzy creamy and is also used in the report, which is his field of choice. About the SI: I thought it was useless on a normal / wide angle but I have already solved a couple of shots with stationary subjects and in low light. Cons: for now the only cons is the stinginess of Mom canon. come on, the hood could put it in the box! the price is even more against a ... paid less than € 500 is a very good lens. Opinion: Shooting with fullframe ... ! Love at first click! I happened by the time a similar feeling. Since I discovered / decided that even for work - or at least for certain types of work - I can afford to use only the fixed, this 35 was the best buy for a few years now. It should be substituted for a good while and bright 50/1.4, focus with which I have never had a great feeling and is supplanting even my good 28 instead focus I still like very much. What can I say, it's perfect for the story. Coupled to the 5d2 without bg is perfect, not too flashy, very balanced. I have already said on the SI in the pro .. maybe perhaps lacks the weather sealing ... I have not yet used in the rain or in the snow (something that happened to me with other lenses), we will see how it behaves in everyday use. sent on December 17, 2013 |
 | Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM Pros: Economic: small, compact, pocket-sized, solid construction, better, and much, compared to 35/2 and 50/1.8; sheltered front lens without hood; already very sharp from f / 4, perfect for street and reportage, but also for some landscape "on the fly." We also put in pro vignetting at f/2.8, because it gives him a certain personality that I like very much. Beautiful bokeh, it becomes easy to play with. Cons: Autofocus is not as immediate as an ultrasound, but still fast enough. Opinion: I bought a lens pocket that I took away space and not weighed in the bag while traveling in Burma ... from his pocket went the first day, to the union of the 5d and from there you are no longer moved. Certainly my best purchase in the past year (*), a lens that surprised me and gave me a lot of soddisfazioni.rnrn (* with that phrase mean "the best surprise" deriving from an economic purpose .. . started as a whim from compulsive shopping, the pancake has become a must-have in a very short time) sent on November 14, 2012 |
 | Canon 1D Mark II Pros: professional body and solid, af speed, gust monstrous double solt, performance up to ISO 1600 Cons: weight, small rear screen for the current stardard Opinion: I purchased this body used, in excellent condition, and the transition from a 5D mkII 1d this was really great. for the work I have to do its fast autofocus and professional staff is the best. I had some doubts about the low resolution and on the menu but, 8.2 megapixels are enough for all editorial use, and far too many to publish photos on the web. the menus are very different from all the other machines I've had, however, after a day of initiation, I find to be quite intuitive. as regards the performance iso can say that up to 1600 iso this Granny if the hollow fine, also helped by the low density of the sensor. In short: I'm very happy. sent on May 07, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
