Starry Sky | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Landscape (wilderness)

Resize to fit window

Paesaggi View gallery (23 photos)

Starry Sky sent on August 13, 2014 (9:39) by Goldrake. 7 comments, 600 views.

4 sec f/2.8, ISO 6400, tripod.

4 persons like it: Dantes, Diamante_P, Franck P, Indianajones2

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Indianajones2

sent on August 13, 2014 (12:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

beautiful shot! tell me the secret?
1- is a sunset or sunrise?
2-car technical data / goal?
3-do you think the high ISO has been used to do to see the stars or to reduce the shutter speed?

as you can see ... I do not get there alone to understand:-D

Goldrake

sent on August 13, 2014 (13:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello, then the pictures I made in the evening 23:00, machine 5D MarkII, 2.8 f / 4 seconds, tripod, let's say I took several pictures with different shutter speeds, what you see on the mountain is the moon coming up, the picture is a mix with various times exhibition, I made an even 20 seconds, but I burned the sky (power of the 5D II), I could shoot even at ISO 1600, but I was taking the milky way and I forgot to lower the ISO, photos worked almost entirely in RAW and finished in photoshop, to see the pinpoint stars with the full frame you can work with time on 25-30 seconds without ghosting, of course using a wide angle, the picture in question I worked with the 16-35, so I had time as 30 seconds, rule 500 / f = 500/16 = about 35sec

Indianajones2

sent on August 13, 2014 (13:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

thanks for your very clear and complete explanations. it remains only the question of whether my goal with 17/70 sigma see that amount of stars that are in your shot. I think the high iso have favored the abundance of stars, as well as the quality of the machine and ... the photographer, of course;-)

Goldrake

sent on August 13, 2014 (16:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thank you for the compliments, the best thing is to try you know how many stupid things I do, but then reboot, your 17-70 if you use it on a small form factor you have to shorten the shutter speed, eg if your car has a magnification factor of 1 5 Law 500 says you can work around the 20 sec max as I had when I shot the 400D with the 10-22 at around 25 sec, but I did not get these results, you have to try the advice is to use a moonless night , clear and a tripod, and then a lot of experimentation

Indianajones2

sent on August 14, 2014 (10:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

excuse the ignorance ... I actually use a canon 600 d with APC sensor, but I do not know the law of the 500 nominated by you, which apparently affects the shutter speed. for the rest of the stand there and I also calendar with moon phases:-D:-D

Goldrake

sent on August 14, 2014 (19:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Who applies the rule of the 600 who's who of 550 500, the substance is, it takes the value 500, then divided by the focal length at which you are shooting, for example 16 mm, the result tells you the time in seconds max before to begin to see the movement of the stars, such as 500/16 = 31.25 sec, in your case if scattassi with a focal length of 16 mm, the calculation would become:

(16 * 1.6) / 500 = 19.53 sec, because your focal length of 16 to be multiplied by 1.6, which is the multiplication factor of your car, so your 16 becomes 25.6

Indianajones2

sent on August 14, 2014 (22:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

for God's sake .... but you're the real Grendizer, a hero to me!

thanks, I've already done the copy / paste your last explanation.

Have not I told you before, but I too stupid to photographic no joke: beautiful photos beautiful are the 10% of the shots:-D

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.