What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on January 30, 2012 (10:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
this is the first egret of 2012! advice and criticism are always welcome! :-) ecco la prima garzetta del 2012! consigli e critiche sono sempre ben accetti! |
| sent on January 30, 2012 (11:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
excellent compo, sin xi whites, that my monitor seems a little gone. ottima compo, peccato x i bianchi, che al mio monitor mi sembrano un pò andati. |
| sent on January 30, 2012 (12:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
the recovery plan penalizes a bit ', I agree with Kimera69 for whites, I find very pleasing cuts the reflection of the water on the body of the egret! hello il piano di ripresa penalizza un po',concordo con Kimera69 per i bianchi, trovo molto piacevole i tagli del riflesso dell'acqua sul corpo della garzetta!! ciao |
| sent on January 30, 2012 (23:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Single fact, the recovery plan up. For the rest I shoot very nice and I agree with Daniba on cutting light .. beautiful. Whites, in contrast to other find them readable, perhaps better risalterebbero down a bit 'highlights Unico appunto, il piano di ripresa alto. Per il resto trovo lo scatto molto piacevole e concordo con Daniba sui tagli di luce..bellissimi. I bianchi, a differenza degli altri li trovo leggibili, forse risalterebbero meglio abbassando un po' le alte luci |
| sent on January 31, 2012 (8:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you all for your visit and for your words. The position was unfortunately forced ... even kneeling down (I was not dressed for mud and slime, unfortunately), finding a slightly elevated embankment was not able to get a better perspective. But if you tell me so I go immediately to pave the whole thing!!! :-D Question from novice: I took a 1/1600 and ISO-400 ... I would have gained in clarity shooting at ISO 200 or ISO-100? obviously adapting the times grazie a tutti per la visita e per le vostre parole. La posizione purtroppo era forzata...anche inginocchiandomi (non ero in tenuta da fango e melma, purtroppo), trovandomi su un argine lievemente rialzato non sono riuscito a ottenere una migliore prospettiva. Però se mi dite così vado subito a spianare il tutto!!!!!!! Domanda da inesperto: ho scattato a 1/1600 e a ISO-400... avrei guadagnato in nitidezza scattando a ISO-200 o ISO-100? ovviamente adattando i tempi |
| sent on February 01, 2012 (19:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful, well composta.Ciao Bella,ben composta.Ciao |
| sent on February 02, 2012 (0:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ I would have gained in clarity shooting at ISO 200 or ISO-100? „ Definitely! However, even if you do not know the D3000, I do not think you should worry on raising the ISO to 400. In addition, at 1/1600, if he had taken off, you'd have a picture does not move. I tried to answer although I'm not an expert. Hello " avrei guadagnato in nitidezza scattando a ISO-200 o ISO-100?" Sicuramente! Però, anche se non conosco la D3000, non penso ti debba preoccupare nell'alzare gli iso a 400. Inoltre, ad 1/1600, se avesse spiccato il volo, avresti avuto un immagine non mossa. Ho provato a risponderti anche se non sono un esperto. Ciao |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |