What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on May 25, 2014 (22:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Bartolick, 15 meters are really a lot, especially for a small subject such as the kingfisher, I think you could hardly get a better result than distanza...1/1000 seems like a more than reasonable time, the distance is really too much and at certain distances, also the atmosphere (various gases such as water vapor, nitrogen, also including pollution, etc. etc..) adversely affects the sharpness .... I gave you a like because I do not think you could have done better in those conditions, hello Richard. Ciao Bartolick, 15 metri sono veramente tanti, soprattutto per un soggetto piccolo come il martin pescatore, penso che difficilmente avresti potuto ottenere un risultato migliore a quella distanza...1/1000 mi sembra un tempo più che ragionevole, la distanza è veramente troppa e a certe distanze, anche l'atmosfera(vari gas come vapore acqueo,azoto, compreso anche l'inquinamento ecc ecc.) incide negativamente sulla nitidezza....ti ho dato un mi piace perché penso che non avresti potuto fare meglio in quelle condizioni, ciao Riccardo. |
| sent on May 26, 2014 (11:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks hello Grazie ciao |
| sent on July 08, 2014 (17:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
When you understand the objective difficulties of one unit and the inevitable presence of some neo, it would be right and proper not to add more. It would be enough the "like" or if you do not like to ignore the natural foto.Foto perfect, of course you can do, just use stuffed animals. Quando si capiscono le difficoltà oggettive di uno scatto e l'inevitabile presenza di qualche neo,sarebbe giusto e corretto non aggiungere altro. Basterebbe il "mi piace" o se non piace ignorare la foto.Foto naturalistiche perfette,certo si possono fare,è sufficiente usare animali imbalsamati. |
| sent on July 08, 2014 (18:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I think however, that any advice or constructive criticism, can not do anything but help to improve and obviously I speak for myself, I also think that ignoring a picture is much worse, I would prefer at least a suggestion or a criticism, rather than being ignored .. . anyway, Raffaele, I respect your opinion, even if I think otherwise. Penso invece, che qualche consiglio o critica costruttiva, non possa far altro che aiutare a migliorarsi e ovviamente parlo anche per me, penso anche che ignorare una foto sia molto peggio, io almeno preferirei un consiglio o una critica, piuttosto che essere ignorato...in ogni caso, Raffaele, rispetto la tua opinione, anche se io la penso diversamente. |
| sent on July 09, 2014 (17:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
when they are constructive criticism are always welcome quando le critiche sono costruttive sono sempre ben accettate |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
10.1 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
