Start Q | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Birds

Resize to fit window

Martin Pescatore 3 View gallery (20 photos)

Start Q sent on April 06, 2014 (19:35) by Elleemme. 15 comments, 820 views.

con Canon EF 1.4x III, 1/1600 f/7.1, ISO 640, tripod. Oasi Naturalistica di Cervara, Italy. Specie: Alcedo atthis

www.lauromagrisphotonature.com -focale 560mm - priorità apertura - val.dev.esp. -0,666 - crop compositivo per taglio quadro

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

user35522

sent on April 06, 2014 (19:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I dislike this .... too close gives me a sense of oppression, or maybe it's just the size?

Elleemme

sent on April 06, 2014 (20:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I thank those who dwelt and have clicked 'like', Nunsepofa 'for the welcome comment ;-).
Nunsepofa x ': "Start Q" is an interpretation that I previsualized during and after shooting the original (open here: www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?t=822246&l=it # box_modifica_3383952) using the double diagonalization and thus the lower right corner.
The second variation is titled "Start bis", with a soft-crop and it is this:
www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?t=822337&srt=new&show2=1&l=
Cropping in a bit ... above and on the right, far below. 8-)
hello and good light, laurel

Riki	sent on April 06, 2014 (20:48) \| This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original) This is what I like the most! How to change the photo with a different slant wow! ... Hello Riki

RobertoOK

sent on April 11, 2014 (16:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Lauro. I follow systematically and follow with interest your comments that I share often, I see almost all of your pictures and I was raised this question: but why Lauro does not lighten the eyes of birds when they are partially in the shade? You teach me that just a trifle for rischiararli albeit slightly, and that it is essential to highlight the eyes of animals, but not all. Look with sympathy

Elleemme

sent on April 11, 2014 (22:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks for the ride and always welcome comments and Riki Giuljacopo. Glad that you appreciated :-): x Giuljacopo: gladly answer to your question .. 8-) depends on our personal photographic style, my approach is to documentary and if the eye is in shadow or penumbra prefer not to distort pp in that situation to light ;-)
hello and wish ... how do you use a good light at all, laurel

Serpero

sent on May 12, 2014 (20:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Very nice pose

Ilario Ledda

sent on May 12, 2014 (21:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

very dynamic picture ... I like it!

Pallotta Luigi

sent on May 12, 2014 (21:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

most beautiful moment caught

Spanu Luigi

sent on May 12, 2014 (22:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Very nice this version, congratulations.

Francesco Abbate

sent on May 12, 2014 (23:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

very nice and especially the laying and cutting! congratulations! a greeting Lauro
francesco :-)

Berna

sent on May 13, 2014 (11:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

A beautiful photo.
Lauro, explain something to me .......: I say that I should lighten the dark side of the half marathon runner (in my opinion not very important thing in that picture ........), here you say that you do not have lightened the eye of the subject because it was in the shade just leave it as it is .........
In my opinion reading the eye of a bird is essential ...... :-|
Hello ;-)

Elleemme

sent on May 13, 2014 (14:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thank you so much of the passage and comment on Serpero, Hilary Ledda, Luigi Pallotta, Spanu Luigi, Francesco Abbate and Bern. Glad that you appreciated :-). X Bern happy to reply to your intervention. In the case of this shoot the eye in my opinion is readable (not legible) mentioned in its three-dimensional thanks to the light reflection in the eye and whites are under control. If your shooting the marathon runner of very dark skin taken from the front but with strong side light to your right (http://www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?t=865956&l=it), his entire right side is without detail ... cheekbone, cheek, eye and ear are indistinguishable, without a hint of three-dimensionality, but also his left eye does not stand out at all ... or salvavi him or banner with white background on the left ... or can you changednto recovery (less complicated). I think the PP can not resolve a situation like that contrasted very light and very dark his skin has accentuated the problem 8-). A direct flash compensation could slightly lighten his part in shadow, it seems unlikely you bring a better beamer for that event and that distance but a serious flash high NG could make a contribution .... always (imho) - ). The differences lie in the dynamic range of the two reflex (other than human), the choice of the values ??in the phase of pre-shooting that allowed a certain amount of martin and readability on a non-readability of both eyes while in the marathon runner ... the first case, given the proximity of the exposure reading was a manageable situation, in the second case your camera has had to interpret a complicated situation given the elements of strong contrast and the areareading. In conclusion, if you agree on almost illegible eye martino and non-readability of both eyes of the marathon runner ... which of the two situations is closest to the dynamic range of our eyes? . Hello everyone :-), laurel Grazie mille del passaggio e commento a Serpero, Ilario Ledda, Pallotta Luigi, Spanu Luigi, Francesco Abbate e Berna . Lieto che l'abbiate apprezzata Sorriso

. X Berna : rispondo volentieri al tuo intervento . Nel caso di questa ripresa l'occhio è secondo me leggibile (non leggibilissimo) nella sua tridimensionalitá accennata grazie a quel leggero riflesso nell'occhio e i bianchi sono sotto controllo. Nel caso del tuo scatto del maratoneta di pelle molto scura ripreso frontalmente ma con forte luce laterale alla tua dx ( www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?t=865956&l=it ) , tutto il suo lato destro è senza dettaglio ...zigomo, guancia, occhio e orecchio sono indistinguibili , senza un accenno di tridimensionalitá , ma anche il suo occhio sinistro non risalta affatto... o salvavi lui o i banner con sfondo bianco a sinistra ... oppure cambiavi punto di ripresa (meno complicato) . Secondo me la p.p. non può risolvere una situazione di luce molto contrastata come quella e la sua pelle scurissima ha accentuato il problema Cool

. Un flash diretto di compensazione poteva schiarire leggermente la sua parte in ombra , difficilmente uno si porta un better beamer per quell'evento e quella distanza ma un flash serio ad alto NG poteva dare il suo contributo .... sempre (imho) ;-)

. Le differenze stanno nella nella gamma dinamica delle due reflex (diverse da quella umana) , nella scelta dei valori nella fase del prescatto che hanno permesso un certo valore di leggibilitá sul martino e una non leggibilitá di entrambi gli occhi del maratoneta ... mentre nel primo caso , vista la vicinanza la lettura dell'esposizione aveva una situazione gestibile ,nel secondo caso la tua reflex ha dovuto interpretare una situazione complicata visti gli elementi di forte contrasto e l'area di lettura. In conclusione se concordi sulla quasi leggibilitá dell'occhio del martino e la non leggibilitá di entrambi gli occhi del maratoneta ... quali delle due situazioni si avvicina di più alla gamma dinamica dei nostri occhi ? . ciao a tutti Sorriso

, lauro

Fabio Cucchi

sent on May 13, 2014 (20:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Great time

Fabio

Claudio Mattiuzzo

sent on September 13, 2019 (22:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

beautiful frame... original
best definition
a greeting

Elleemme

sent on September 15, 2019 (16:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thank you very much for the pleasant comment Fabio Cucchi and Claudio Mattiuzzo. Happy that you appreciated her. Good life by Lauro

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.