JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on February 16, 2014 (9:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I wonder how much disturbs the view of the flower on the left, maybe I would have chosen a vertical shooting focusing only on what to right or vice versa. Let me wrong maybe a consideration. The location you choose to resume the flowers seem to be somewhere between the two, however, focusing on the maf to the right. Using a similar diaphragm and not being perfectly parallel've got a sharpness inaccurate on your subject and at the same time blurring of the left is not so as not to annoy the viewer. Shooting freehand must always pay attention to the shutter speed, which if you do not have some valid points of support must be at least equal to the focal length used considering that your 100 macro is not stabilized. Mi chiedo quanto possa disturbare la visione del fiore a sx, forse avrei scelto una ripresa verticale concentrandomi solo su quello a dx o viceversa. Consentimi una considerazione magari errata. La posizione scelta per riprendere i fiori mi sembra sia a metà tra i due concentrando però la maf su quello di dx. Utilizzando un simile diaframma e non essendo perfettamente parallelo hai ottenuto una nitidezza imprecisa sul tuo soggetto e nello stesso tempo la sfocatura di quello a sx non è tale da non infastidire chi osserva. Scattando a mano libera devi sempre porre attenzione al tempo di scatto, il quale se non hai dei validi punti d'appoggio deve essere almeno pari alla focale utilizzata considerando anche che il tuo 100 macro non è stabilizzato.
sent on February 16, 2014 (10:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the ride Pigi! The maf maybe not perfect, but having chosen a diaphragm so open to have a cleaner background, and with a three-dimensional person so, I had some trouble :-) also because the camera was resting on the ground and in that position was not easy adjust the focus.
For the times you're right: I think there is a little 'shake-: I have made some movement when shooting too! I thought that having the camera resting on the ground would have saved me, but with hindsight it would have been better to raise the ISO to at least 200 :-)
Grazie del passaggio Pigi! La maf forse non è perfetta, ma avendo scelto un diaframma così aperto per avere uno sfondo più pulito, e con un soggetto così tridimensionale, ho avuto qualche difficoltà anche perché la fotocamera era appoggiata a terra e in quella posizione non era facile regolare la messa a fuoco.
Per i tempi hai ragione: mi sembra ci sia un po' di micromosso: devo aver fatto qualche movimento di troppo durante lo scatto! Pensavo che l'aver appoggiato a terra la fotocamera mi avrebbe salvato, ma con il senno di poi sarebbe stato meglio alzare gli iso almeno a 200
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
anche perché la fotocamera era appoggiata a terra e in quella posizione non era facile regolare la messa a fuoco.