JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
California 2011, Sequoia National Park, Canon60D con EF70-200f/4L IS, 1/160sec a f/14, ISO 500
What do you think about this photo?
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on December 07, 2011 (17:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
If what you see in the foreground to the left and then to the right are huge logs taken I went in a different way, perhaps putting a person at their base in order to perceive their size. In this way, frankly I do not transmit anything. Otherwise you would have had to tighten heavily on a small part of them to observe the peculiarities of the trunk. Se quanto si vede in primo piano a sx e successivamente a dx sono enormi tronchi credo andassero ripresi in modo differente, magari mettendo alla loro base una persona per poter percepire la loro dimensione. In questo modo francamente non mi trasmette nulla. Altrimenti avresti dovuto stringere enormemente su una piccola parte di essi per osservare le particolarità del tronco.
sent on December 07, 2011 (19:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
in fact we understand being persons known, but the photo does not capture ...
certain that this section has the very broad boundaries: in the past I had enjoyed a shot of trees in honor of the section Flora and I commented that we often do not think about why dominate macro subjects, but it would also place for baobab ... but I had not thought about the redwoods :-):-D in effetti si capisce trattandosi di soggetti noti, ma la foto non cattura...
certo che questa sezione ha i confini molto ampi: in passato avevo apprezzato uno scatto di alberi in omaggio alla sezione Flora e avevo commentato che spesso non ci pensiamo perchè dominano i soggetti macro, ma ci sarebbe posto anche per i baobab... ma non avevo pensato alle sequoie
sent on December 08, 2011 (9:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Are in perfect agreement with Pigi, having seen them myself maybe I tried a shot from the bottom up to show their majesty.
However, do not give up, with some advice shots will see more and more attractive!
HELLO Sono in perfetto accordo con Pigi, avendoli visti anch'io forse avrei tentato una ripresa dal basso verso l'alto per mostrare la loro maestosità.
Comunque non demordere, con qualche consiglio gli scatti vedrai saranno sempre più accattivanti!
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
