What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on December 05, 2013 (16:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful colors! To my taste, perhaps a bit of red in less sky background.
hello
Clare Bei colori! Per mio gusto forse un filo di rosso in meno nel fondo cielo.
ciao
Chiara |
| sent on December 05, 2013 (17:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It is clear you are right! I was not there to work it too :) Si chiara hai ragione ! Non sono stato lì a lavorarla troppo :) |
user4758 | sent on December 05, 2013 (18:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Canopus beautiful! Give me some more technical detail? I want to start taking something, but I am a complete 'gnorante! :-) Bellissima Canopo! Mi dai qualche dettaglio tecnico in più? Vorrei iniziare anch'io a scattare qualcosa ma sono un completo 'gnorante!  |
| sent on December 05, 2013 (19:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Zeppo what kind of detail I'm not like the "monsters" that run in this section the type cobarcore Palmieri Dr. Fox is so sorry if I forget the others:-D
40d modified to fire pentax put in parallel to a meade 25 cm all driven by a SBIG STV
Two poses of a century the 1minute 10 minutes then put in register with Photoshop, nothing dark flat bias make me a headache even if they are really picking up.
I would recommend you start with the ioptron to make fields and objects with a tele .. Equi light you enjoy a world :-) Zeppo che tipo di dettaglio non sono mica come i " mostri" che girano in questa sezione tipo i dott cobarcore Palmieri Volpe ecc è scusate se dimentico gli altri 
40d modificata al fuoco del pentax messo in parallelo a un meade da 25 cm il tutto guidato da una STV sbig
Due pose una di 1minuto la sec di 10 minuti poi messe a registro con Photoshop , niente dark flat bias mi fanno venire il mal di testa anche se fanno veramente molto in ripresa .
Io ti consiglierei di iniziare con l ioptron a fare campi e oggetti con un tele .. Attrezz leggera ti diverti un mondo |
user4758 | sent on December 05, 2013 (20:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I want to resume galaxies / nebulae, of which focal length I have to be? Can I use the normal camera lens? Type the 100-400? Io voglio riprendere galassie/nebulose, su che lunghezza focale devo stare? Posso usare delle normali lenti fotografiche? tipo il 100-400? |
| sent on December 05, 2013 (20:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A focal 400 can make a lot of items! Andromeda, m33, the triplet of the lion in the field are small but we are doing well! The area antares, North America, a lot of items! Serving the guide frame and the sky good A focale 400 puoi fare un sacco di oggetti ! Andromeda ,m33 , il tripletto del leone vengono piccole però nel campo ci stanno bene ! La zona antares , Nord America , un sacco di oggetti ! Serve la montatura la guida e il cielo buono |
user4758 | sent on December 06, 2013 (7:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the info Canopus! The iOptron SkyTracker it mean? I think 400mm is not holding them ... or you? Grazie per le info Canopo! L'iOptron intendi lo SkyTracker? Mi sa che 400mm non li regge... oppure si? |
| sent on December 06, 2013 (8:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
No 400 mm does not hold, can work well up to 135mm focal length with ioptron, but to start and a great tool for me No 400 mm non li regge ,puoi lavorare bene fino alla focale 135mm con ioptron ,ma per iniziare e un ottimo strumento secondo me |
user4758 | sent on December 06, 2013 (10:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
For 400mm (and beyond) I have to take something like EQ5, right? The AstroTrac holds something more or are we always acts at the level dell'iOptron? Per 400mm (e oltre) devo prendere qualcosa tipo EQ5, vero? L'AstroTrac regge qualcosa di più o siamo sempra a livello dell'iOptron? |
| sent on December 06, 2013 (10:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
No work well for me if you want to frame 400 serves more guidance or ccd or hand tool with parallel! I think even the new 10micron start with the polar drift method is able to take pictures with the precise guided focal .. :) No per me se vuoi lavorare bene a 400 serve la montatura più una guida o ccd o a mano con strumento in parallelo ! Credo che neanche la nuova 10micron messa in polare con il metodo della deriva riesca a fare foto guidate precise con quella focale .. :) |
| sent on December 06, 2013 (12:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
well, the frames super tank as the 10 micron I think reggano poses * not * also led to the focal and up to ten minutes. In practice, those who use only those focal does not need guiding. There is also to say that cost the same as a small car and usually one does not take them to use only focal so short, but well-biggest tools that driving the demand.
Zeppo, for a 400 mm or EQ5 HEQ5 should be fine, but you have to drive.
hello
Clare
mah, le montature super carro armato come la 10 micron penso che reggano pose *non* guidate anche a quelle focali e fino a una decina di minuti. In pratica chi usa solo quelle focale non ha bisogno di autoguida. C'è anche da dire che costano come un'utilitaria e che di solito uno non le prende per usare solo focali così corte, ma strumenti ben più grossi che la guida la richiedono.
Zeppo, per 400 mm una EQ5 o HEQ5 vanno benone, però devi guidare.
ciao
Chiara
|
user4758 | sent on December 06, 2013 (12:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the reply Chiara! With drive do you mean? I also need a telescope? Grazie per la risposta Chiara! Con guidare cosa intendi? Mi serve anche un telescopio? |
| sent on December 06, 2013 (15:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ we do when we do the grigliatine nighttime observations „
And ... you do well! the nighttime observations should be a time of fun, I would not spend the whole night to test frames! ;-) " noi facciamo le grigliatine quando facciamo serate osservative"
...e fate bene! le serate osservative devono essere un momento di divertimento, non passerei tutta la notte a testare montature!  |
| sent on April 27, 2017 (23:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
weak exposure. Tui've missed the blue area at the top. esposizione debole. Tui sei perso la zona azzurra in alto. |
| sent on April 27, 2017 (23:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
More than weak exposure I would say that everything is missing :-D are two clicks .. one for trapeze and one for 10 min
Without dark and flat .....: green: nothing to take as an example più che esposizione debole direi che manca tutto sono due scatti .. uno per il trapezio e una da 10 min
senza dark e flat..... :green: niente di cui prendere come esempio |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
