JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on October 11, 2013 (23:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Sin for the presence of anthropogenic elements and for the composition unbalanced. Remember that if the subject was taken up in a controlled environment is clearly stated in the caption field. hello and good light, laurel Peccato per la presenza di elementi antropici e per la composizione sbilanciata. Ricordati che se il soggetto è stato ripreso in un ambiente controllato è da dichiararlo nel campo didascalia. ciao e buona luce, lauro
sent on October 12, 2013 (9:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Lauro Thanks for the recommendations and comments. I updated the caption. With regard to the composition with different cut do you think could be improved and made more interesting? As the taglieresti? The other photos in the series do you like? I thank you for the time you gonna give me. Greetings Maximum Grazie Lauro per le raccomandazioni ed il commento. Ho provveduto ad aggiornare la didascalia. Per quanto riguarda la composizione pensi che con taglio diverso potrebbe essere migliorata e resa più interessante? Come la taglieresti? Le altre foto della serie ti piacciono? Ti ringrazio per il tempo che mi dedicherai. Un saluto Massimo
sent on October 12, 2013 (21:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The boulders in the foreground blurred and huge impallano and the subject becomes a co-star, the only alternative was to use a more adequate as the Canon 100-400mm IS USM and try to give more importance to the protagonist. The setting, however, I'm not excited because of anthropogenic elements. to reduce the blur in the foreground was wiser to close the iris (F.9) and consequently raise the iso. (Imho) hello, laurel I massi in primo piano sfocati e grossi impallano e il soggetto diventa un co-protagonista, l'unica alternativa era di usare un'ottica più adeguata come il canon 100-400mm l is usm e cercare di dare più importanza al protagonista. L'ambientazione comunque non mi emoziona a causa degli elementi antropici . per ridurre lo sfocato in primo piano era più saggio chiudere il diaframma (f.9) e alzare di conseguenza gli iso. (imho) ciao, lauro
sent on October 13, 2013 (21:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you for your consideration. Indeed, the fence post down, "breaks down" the composition. I could close on the rocks to crop and more on the subject in this way since the MAF was on the deer should recover sharpness as I took in a very broad way and then take only the area clear. Of course I will lose megapixel but considering that I'm 21 Mpixel photo the damage will be contained. Thank you for your contribution. Greetings, Massimo Grazie per l'approfondimento. Effettivamente il palo della recinzione abbattuto , "abbatte" anche la composizione . Sui massi potrei croppare e chiudere di più sul soggetto in questo modo dato che la MAF era sul daino dovrei recuperare nitidezza visto che ho scattato in modo molto ampio e quindi prendere solo l'area nitida. Naturalmente perderò megapixel ma considerando che ho 21 Mpixel di foto il danno sarà contenuto. Grazie per il tuo contributo. Un saluto, Massimo
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
1.7 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
