What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 04, 2011 (17:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I do not mind, pleasant, clean and delicate.
In addition to the 580, what did you use? I see the light come from two different points (panel, second flash, etc) ...
Greetings A me non dispiace, gradevole, pulita, delicata.
Oltre al 580, cosa hai usato? Vedo la luce provenire da due punti diversi (pannello, secondo flash, etc)...
Un saluto |
| sent on November 04, 2011 (17:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
day we were at the canon of Rome, there was probably some softbox but I do not remember why the pattern of lights left to be desired and we did everything with our flash ... thanks for the ride, too bad that this section is snubbed by users, we have increased exchanges of experiences although as far as I'm concerned amateur, that would help you grow as in all other genres, in the end, taking advantage of various events around Italy the opportunities out there, they will not be shooting in controlled light but I give a lot of satisfaction, sorry for the outburst. eravamo al canon day di Roma, probabilmente c'era qualche softbox ma non ricordo bene perchè lo schema di luci lasciava a desiderare e facevamo tutto con i nostri flash...grazie del passaggio, peccato che questa sezione sia snobbata dagli utenti, potremmo avere maggiori scambi d'esperienze anche se per quanto mi riguarda amatoriali, che aiuterebbero a crescere come in tutti gli altri generi, in fin dei conti sfruttando varie manifestazioni in giro per l'italia le opportunità non mancano, non saranno scatti in luce controllata ma a me danno molta soddisfazione, scusate per lo sfogo. |
| sent on November 04, 2011 (18:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
nice crisp exaggerated and blurred at the right point see the second eye.
for the rest I agree with you, bella nitida esagerata, e sfocato al punto giusto vedi il secondo occhio.
per il resto concordo con te, |
user1159 | sent on March 27, 2012 (14:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I understand your outburst, the site, despite the new version continues to be predominantly natural.
Very beautiful. I like the processing of the skin, especially the colors.
You may correct the aperture used. I think it's an f/3.2 or 3.6. Are you sure?
I really like the 70-200 f/2.8 non-IS. How are you?
You feel the need of the stabilizer?
Thanks for the replies.
Max Capisco il tuo sfogo, il sito, nonostante la nuova versione, continua ad essere prevalentemente naturalistico.
Molto bella. Mi piace l'elaborazione della pelle, soprattutto i colori.
Potresti correggere il valore del diaframma utilizzato. Credo sia un f/3.2 o 3.6. Confermi?
Mi piace molto il 70-200 f/2.8 non IS. Come ti trovi?
Senti la necessità dello stabilizzatore?
Grazie per le risposte.
Max |
| sent on March 27, 2012 (20:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
you're right, it is not wrong aperture, the lens was wrong, is 85 1,2 L II, fix it ... thanks for the ride, cmq with the 70-200 is no I am fine, I believe that the center is sharp as the series II and lost slightly at the edges, using it only for portraits it little impact on shooting. In low-light environments such as concerts, you must use higher iso for safety times, certainly with vers. stab. would be better. Hello hai ragione, non è sbagliato il diaframma, era sbagliato l'obiettivo, è l'85 1,2 L II, l'ho corretto...grazie del passaggio, cmq con il 70-200 no is mi trovo benissimo, ritengo che al centro sia nitido quanto il serie II e perda leggermente ai bordi, utilizzandolo esclusivamente per i ritratti la cosa incide poco sugli scatti. In ambienti poco illuminati come ai concerti si deve utilizzare iso più alti per avere tempi di sicurezza, sicuramente con la vers. stab. sarebbe meglio. Ciao |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
