Water Rail | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Birds

1.7 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

Varie View gallery (19 photos)

Water Rail sent on September 18, 2013 (21:01) by Lucaben. 13 comments, 1110 views.

1/400 f/7.1, ISO 250, Vallevecchia, Italy. Specie: Rallus aquaticus

View High Resolution 1.7 MP

21 persons like it: Bepi, Boland, Carlo Martin, Conti Cristiano, Devid Ballari, Edo91, Enrico Ravasi, Fabio Da Dalt, Fabio Maccagno, Francesco Abbate, Franco Giannattasio, Giorgio Guarraia, Istrice, Justitia Terrena, Kilimanjaro, Marco50, Nikon300, Paolo.m, Ricky_71, Robsit, Spanu Luigi

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Kilimanjaro

sent on September 19, 2013 (14:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Beautiful pictures and beautiful setting, good.
Hello from Kilimanjaro.

Enrico51

sent on October 05, 2013 (21:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Nice clip set

Bepi	sent on October 05, 2013 (21:09) \| This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original) Beautiful water colors, excellent shot hello

Francesco Abbate

sent on October 05, 2013 (21:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

beautiful and unusual pose! wow! congratulations! A greeting ;-):-P francis

Marco50

sent on October 05, 2013 (21:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Congratulations x sharpness setting and shutter shades!
Likes
Marco

Spanu Luigi

sent on October 05, 2013 (21:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Excellent image.

Antonio Corradi

sent on October 05, 2013 (22:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Excellent photo

Pallotta Luigi

sent on October 06, 2013 (7:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Very nice

Fabio Maccagno

sent on October 06, 2013 (10:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Great shoot, difficult subject ;-)

Nikon300

sent on October 06, 2013 (17:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Too bad for chromatic aberrations on the beak: you used the Pentax 560?

EDIT: since I was deprived of the opportunity to argue (my compliments ;-)) I do it here:

“ this is pure pedantry, there are chromatic aberrations!
Have you secured with aberrations. If not I added the shooting data would not consider this place.
The DA560 has a brilliant clarity, greater even my Nikon 300mm f2.8 VRII. The chromatic aberrations are related, as in post-production can be removed in 10 seconds. someone on the net has put the rumor of the aberrations of the da560 so too excessive. Let us remember that it is a 'optics with 6 lenses, so in certain cases, such as in sunlight against or where the white border on I burnriscontratto some slight aberration and can be eliminated with a few clicks. Again, in this picture there are aberrations, although it is also a crop very very thorough. The DA560 is a view that to use it you need a good handle. Check the other photos I took of the 560, and tell me if you see any aberrations. In addition, I ask you, if the aberrations that you saw in the picture (which I do not see) have compromised the image quality??
„

Then: as the first advice I would say that if you do not want criticism would be good not to post any.
Second, fussiness or less on the beak aberrations are all right, then that can be easily eliminated this is another matter entirely
Third, personally by a goal from 7000 eurozzi I (and I stress IO) I would expect more, youtto here ... certain that if we want to use the "handle" ...

To make you happy I promise you that you do not steal the lollipop nor snack, pinky promise:-D and I adapt immediately all'andazzo General Forum: beautiful, beautiful, beautiful, excellent capture, quoto those who preceded me, a marvel , congratulations ... so happy?

Farewell.

PS: pathetic take the opportunity to comment to a user just because he made a "critical" really pathetic wow! and ... pedantry for pedantry ... "Aberrations" is spelled with one "b" ;-)

Peccato per le aberrazioni cromatiche sul becco: hai usato il Pentax 560?

EDIT: visto che mi è stata tolta la possibilità di ribattere (i miei complimenti ;-)

) lo faccio qui:

" questa è pignoleria allo stato puro, non ci sono abberrazioni cromatiche!
Vi siete fissati con le abberrazioni. Se non inserivo i dati di scatto non avresti posto questa considerazione.
Il DA560 ha una nitidezza superlativa , maggiore anche del mio nikon 300mm f2.8 vrII. Le abberrazioni cromatiche sono relative, in quanto in post produzione si possono togliere in 10 secondi. qualcuno in rete ha messo in giro la voce della abberrazioni del da560 in modo troppo eccessivo. Ricordiamoci che è un 'ottica con 6 lenti, quindi in determinati casi, tipo in contro luce o dove i bianchi rasentano la bruciatura ho riscontratto qualche abberrazione leggerissima ed eliminabile con un paio di click. Ripeto , in questa foto non ci sono abberrazioni, nonostante sia anche un crop molto molto spinto . Il DA560 è un'ottica che per usarla ci vuole un buon manico. Controlla le altre foto del 560 che ho scattato, e dimmi se vedi delle abberrazioni. Inoltre ti chiedo, se le abberrazioni che hai visto nella foto (che io non vedo) hanno compromesso la qualità dell'immagine ????
?"

Allora: come primo consiglio direi che se non si vogliono critiche sarebbe bene non postare nulla.
Secondo: pignoleria o meno sul becco le aberrazioni ci sono eccome, che poi siano facilmente eliminabili questo è tutto un altro discorso
Terzo: personalmente da un obiettivo da 7000 eurozzi io (e sottolineo IO) mi aspetterei di più, tutto qui ... certo che se per usarlo ci vuole "il manico" ...

Per farti contento ti prometto che non ti ruberò il lecca-lecca nè la merendina, giurin giurello MrGreen

e mi adeguo subito all'andazzo generale del forum: bella, bellissima, stupenda, ottima cattura, quoto chi mi ha preceduto, una meraviglia, complimenti ... contento così?

Addio.

PS: patetico togliere la possibilità di commento ad un utente solo perchè ha fatto una "critica", davvero patetico Eeeek!!!

e ... pignoleria per pignoleria ... "aberrazioni" si scrive con una sola "b" ;-)

Franco Giannattasio

sent on October 06, 2013 (18:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Very beautiful!

Devid Ballari

sent on October 06, 2013 (23:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

beautiful beautiful

Lucaben

sent on October 08, 2013 (18:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

“ Too bad for chromatic aberrations on the beak: you used the Pentax 560? „

this is fussiness pure state, there are no chromatic aberrations!
Have you secured with aberrations. If not I added the shooting data would not consider this place.
The DA560 has a brilliant clarity, greater even my Nikon 300mm f2.8 VRII. The chromatic aberrations are related, as in post-production can be removed in 10 seconds. someone on the net has put the rumor of the aberrations of the da560 so too excessive. Let us remember that it is a 'optics with 6 lenses, so in certain cases, such as in sunlight against or where the white border on the burn I riscontratto some slight aberration and can be eliminated with a few clicks. Again, in this picture there are aberrations, although it is also a crop very very thorough. The DA560 is a view that to use it you need a good handle. Check the other photos I took of the 560, and tell me if you see any aberrations. In addition, I ask you, if the aberrations that you saw in the picture (which I do not see) have compromised the image quality??

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.