What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on January 23, 2024 (22:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Unbelievably beautiful,
just so many compliments!
Thank you for the shot. Incredibilmente bella,
solo tanti complimenti!
Grazie dello scatto. |
| sent on January 24, 2024 (8:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Unfortunately, as "easy" as it is to push the focal length with SCs, alas, the stars are always pitiful. And also with the Edge HD version that I had and resold on the spot despite the fact that the dedicated flattener alone cost the same as a used C8.
P.S. Why gain 140 ? In the 294 the unity gain is at 120. Purtroppo per quanto sia "facile" la focale spinta con gli SC ahimè le stelle fanno sempre pena. E pure con la versione Edge HD che ho avuto e rivenduto seduto stante nonostante il solo spianatore dedicato costasse come un C8 usato.
PS Perché gain 140 ? Nella 294 l'unity gain è a 120. |
| sent on January 24, 2024 (9:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I have a C8 EdgeHD and the stars are great, these actually have something wrong with them...
In this recovery, we can clearly see
https://www.juzaphoto.com/hr.php?t=4601856&r=99321&l=it Io ho un C8 EdgeHD e le stelle sono ottime, queste hanno effettivamente qualcosa che non va...
In questa ripresa si vedono bene
www.juzaphoto.com/hr.php?t=4601856&r=99321&l=it |
| sent on January 24, 2024 (9:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Choppy poses due to taut cable, I have poses at 300s apparently perfect. I still have to check the collimation, as written it is a crude attempt. The telescope is used, and I have yet to test it both mechanically and optically. Also a manual focus and condensation on the front plate. Pose mosse causa cavo teso, ho pose a 300s apparentemente perfette. Devo ancora controllare la collimazione, come scritto è un tentativo grossolano. Il telescopio è usato, e devo ancora testarlo sia meccanicamente, che otticamente. Anche un focus manuale e condensa sulla lastra frontale. |
| sent on January 25, 2024 (23:56) | This comment has been translated
Marvelous |
| sent on February 05, 2024 (5:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Just lovely, good and congratulations Semplicemente incantevole, bravo e complimenti |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
2.8 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
