What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 09, 2011 (15:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Personally I find this mark (?) cumbersome and not very photogenic.
That's okay, light, compo, all bikes taken care of, but 'what is in the middle ....: fconfuso:
Hello
LC personalmete trovo questa boa(?) ingombrante e poco fotogenica.
Cioè va tutto bene, luce, compo, tutto moto curato, però 'sta cosa in mezzo....
Ciao
LC |
| sent on November 09, 2011 (15:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Alberto ... beautiful light on the river as the sun drops below the treetops. Quoto lordcasco to the first floor. Maybe there was a willingness on your part to find some sort of point "gravity" of the photo, or at least a foreground element that added interest and depth to the picture, but I do not think this buoy should fulfill this task ;-) It 's just my impression, but the fence naked I would have liked more. Ste Ciao Alberto...bellissima la luce sul fiume col sole che scende sotto le chiome degli alberi. Quoto lordcasco per il primo piano. Forse c'era la volontà da parte tua di trovare una sorta di punto "gravitazionale" della foto, o comunque un elemento in primo piano che aggiungesse interesse e profondità alla foto, però questa boa non mi sembra che svolga bene questo compito ;-) E' solo una mia impressione, ma la staccionata nuda mi sarebbe piaciuta maggiormente. Ste |
| sent on November 09, 2011 (16:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you for your feedback. I understand that a rusty buoy is not an object "beautiful" in the strict sense, but I deliberately included in the photo because it seemed like an object "mysterious" difficult context and therefore almost "lost in time" (hence the title of the photo) . Here I would say that restored the image a sense of "timelessness" and this caught my attention. The small size of the photo then do not make the details of the surface buoy, covered, like the grass, as many drops of water.
The photo can like it or not and do not argue: I have just told me and explained what led to it.
Hello, Alberto.
@ Stebesa: I would have preferred there was no fence, only because I preferred ... the mark:-D ;-)!
PS: I do not know if you noticed, but this picture is a HDR. Grazie per i vostri commenti. Capisco che una boa arruginita non sia un oggetto "bello" in senso stretto, ma l'ho inclusa volutamente nella foto perchè sembrava un oggetto "misterioso" di difficile contestualizzazione e dunque quasi "perso nel tempo" (da qui il titolo della foto). Ecco: direi che restituiva all'immagine un senso di "atemporalità" e per questo ha attratto la mia attenzione. Le piccole dimensioni della foto poi non rendono i dettagli della superficie della boa, coperta, come l'erba, da tantissime goccie d'acqua.
La foto può piacere o no e non discuto: vi ho solo illustrato cosa mi ha comunicato e indotto a farla.
Ciao, Alberto.
@Stebesa: avrei preferito non ci fosse la staccionata, perchè preferivo solo... la boa   !
P.S.: non so se ve ne siete accorti, ma questa foto è un HDR. |
| sent on November 09, 2011 (16:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In a context to Magritte say, this buoy is well ;-) Unfortunately, we do not actually perceive the details of the surface. The hdr I had imagined because the fence and the mark visible to the observer are in the shade, but keep cmq exposure away from the left of the histogram. I could not be sure because cmq is very well executed and leaves no room for artifacts. STe In un contesto alla Magritte diciamo, questa boa ci sta benissimo ;-) Purtroppo effettivamente non si percepiscono i dettagli della superficie. L'hdr l'avevo immaginato perchè la staccionata e la boa visibili all'osservatore sono in ombra, ma mantengono cmq un'esposizione lontana dalla parte sx dell'istogramma. Non potevo esserne certo perchè cmq è molto ben eseguito e non lascia spazio ad artefatti. STe |
| sent on November 09, 2011 (18:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful, excellent light management.
Hello. Bella, ottima gestione della luce.
Ciao. |
| sent on November 09, 2011 (21:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
How did you get the HDR?
I really like compliments? Come hai ottenuto l'HDR?
Mi piace molto, complimenti? |
| sent on November 10, 2011 (8:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
@ Mauro: HDR from 3 RAW files (-2, 0, +2 stops) pre-processed in Lightroom, merged in Photomatix and finalized in Photoshop ;-) @ Mauro: HDR ottenuto da 3 file RAW (-2; 0; +2 stop) pre-trattati in Lightroom, uniti in Photomatix e finalizzati in Photoshop |
| sent on November 10, 2011 (10:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you very much, you've MP. ;-) Grazie mille, hai MP. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
