What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on August 08, 2023 (12:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Washed with dixan :-P Lavata col dixan |
| sent on August 08, 2023 (12:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful effect sought?
Charles, I think it's dash (Dash. More white you cannot). had to accept the exchange with the 2 drums of other detergent, it would not have discolored bella effetto ricercato?
Carlo, penso sia dash (Dash. Più bianco non si può). doveva accettare lo scambio con i 2 fustini di altro detersivo, non avrebbe scolorito |
| sent on August 08, 2023 (13:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Dash, yes. More white you can not :-P
But in this photo, white is typical of Dixan, less white than the exchange-proof competitor :-D Dash, si. Più bianco non si può
Ma in questa foto, il bianco è tipico del Dixan, meno bianco del concorrente a prova di scambio  |
| sent on August 08, 2023 (14:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
you are 2 born comedians... ;-) siete 2 comici nati... |
| sent on August 08, 2023 (14:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Born with the comedy :-D Nati con la comicia |
| sent on August 08, 2023 (14:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Fabio effect... natural, in the sense that it was just white like that... (WB car) Fabio effetto...naturale, nel senso che era proprio bianca cosi'... (WB auto) |
| sent on August 08, 2023 (17:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ok thank you. keep it up ;-) ok grazie. continua così |
| sent on August 08, 2023 (18:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
WB Auto?... Do you mean car wash? :-P WB Auto?... vuoi dire autolavaggio? |
| sent on August 08, 2023 (19:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In the past I customized the white balance by always carrying the cardboard with me, then I saw that I lost time because if the light condition varies a little you have to do it again and now I'm on the car. The Canon gets it right and no so I set a shift of the white balance towards warm tones. The Olympus is much more accurate. In my opinion. In passato personalizzavo il bilanciamento del bianco portandomi sempre dietro il cartoncino, poi ho visto che perdevo tempo perché se varia un poco la condizione di luce devi rifarlo e ora sto su auto. La Canon ci azzecca si e no così ho impostato uno shift del white balance verso toni caldi. L'Olympus è invece molto più accurata. Secondo me. |
| sent on August 08, 2023 (19:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Fabio 8-) In my experience, Canon depends on the model (and also on the optics) [6D warmer in general, but balanced with 70-200 L IS USM, 200D (and 100D) more balanced than 6D, especially with Sigma lenses that "cool" colors. Olympus, quite balanced regardless, especially with Panasonic lenses ;-) ]
Fabio  Per mia esperienza, Canon dipende dal modello (e anche dall'ottica) [6D più calda in generale, ma equilibrata con 70-200 L IS USM, 200D (e 100D) più equilibrata della 6D, specie con gli obiettivi Sigma che "raffreddano" i colori. Olympus, abbastanza equilibrata a prescindere, specie con le ottiche Panasonic ]
|
| sent on August 08, 2023 (20:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Carlo as often happens you are right. I expressed myself badly, in fact having only one Canon absolutely not sufficient as a sample to represent the entire population, I should have said MY Canon ... as well as MIA Olympus.
In fact, the goal also comes into play. I have often shared my thoughts on optics with you. Carlo come accade spesso hai ragione. Mi sono espresso male, infatti avendo io una sola Canon assolutamente non sufficiente come campione atto a rappresentare l'intera popolazione, avrei dovuto dire la MIA Canon...così come la MIA Olympus.
In effetti poi entra in gioco anche l'obiettivo. Le mie considerazioni sulle ottiche le ho spesso condivise con te.
Mi trovo perfettamente sulla validità Olympus con le ottiche Panasonic o sigma o canon. Trovo meno bilanciato il colore con i suoi. Lo avevo già notato con gli OM. |
| sent on August 09, 2023 (7:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ps x Fabio and Carlo : then I gave an adjustment in PP, of course, but I only saturated a little' the colors around leaving the subject as it was... ;-) Ps x Fabio e Carlo : poi un'aggiustatina l'ho data in PP, ovvio, ma ho solo saturato un po' i colori intorno lasciando il soggetto così com'era… |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
3.7 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
