What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on January 05, 2023 (14:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Personal opinion: The use of an aperture so open to these distances or goes to the limit with a selective MAF or you get these shots: neither meat nor fish, the lack of a well-defined focus area within the image does not allow the eye to stop on some point. The photo does not push you to dwell on the subject and grasp all the details Parere personale: L'utilizzo di un diaframma così aperto a queste distanze o si spinge al limite con una MAF selettiva oppure si ottengono questi scatti: né carne né pesce, la mancanza di una zona a fuoco ben definita all'interno dell'immagine non permette all'occhio di fermarsi su qualche punto. La foto non ti spinge a soffermarti sul soggetto e coglierne tutti i dettagli |
| sent on January 06, 2023 (10:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Unfortunately it is a shrunken photo and has lost detail, but the photo seen on the computer with its own size is another thing, the blurred effect and made at closing aperture 5, this photo and for instagram, but I assure you that seen with its own size and a whole other thing .... I did not want to do the braketing because I do not like so much, I like to take a part of the subject, details and sharpness to the PC top, unfortunately the shrunken photos lose details, but I nn like too sharp I like soft, then it becomes surreal purtroppo è una foto rimpicciolita è ha perso dettaglio, ma la foto vista al computer con le proprie dimensioni è tutto un'altra cosa, l'effetto sfocato e fatto a chiusura diaframma 5, questa foto e per instagram, ma ti assicuro che vista con le proprie dimensioni e tutta un'altra cosa....non ho voluto fare il braketing perche non mi piace tanto assai, mi piace prendere una parte del soggetto, dettagli e nitidezza al pc top, purtroppo le foto rimpicciolite perdono dettagli, pero a me nn piace troppo nitida mi piace morbida, poi diventa surreale |
| sent on January 06, 2023 (10:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
cmq thanks for the tio opinion Luigi, Happy New Year cmq grazie del tio parere luigi, buon anno |
| sent on January 07, 2023 (8:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I find the image beautiful. The only problem I see is the lack of sharpness on the central flower of the orchid. With Topaz sharpen AI in my opinion you solve it. Io trovo l'immagine bella. L'unico problema che vedo è la mancanza di nitidezza sul fiore centrale dell'orchidea. Con Topaz sharpen AI a mio avviso lo risolvi. |
| sent on January 07, 2023 (9:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
thank you very much the photo and sharp in the real size then with photoshop I removed the grain and lost sharpness, being that I have an old PC I have these results, Topaz I know it as soon as I have the good PC I redo the photo with more sharpness grazie mille il foto e nitido nella dimesione reale poi con photoshop ho tolto della grana e ha perso nitidezza, essendo che ho un pc vecchio ho questi risultati, topaz lo conosco appena ho il pc buono rifaccio la foto con piu nitideza |
| sent on January 07, 2023 (9:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the consigli grazie per i consigli |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |