What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
user28347 | sent on October 25, 2022 (15:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
crazy ;-) pazzesco |
| sent on October 25, 2022 (15:23) | This comment has been translated
Thank you! |
| sent on October 25, 2022 (15:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
SEVABBE' :-o
E.P.Immediately
immediately! SEVABBE' 
E.P.
Subito immediatamente! |
| sent on October 25, 2022 (15:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Really amazing, congratulations
Franco Veramente stupefacente, complimenti
Franco |
| sent on October 25, 2022 (15:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Magnificent, congratulations! Magnifica, complimenti! |
| sent on October 25, 2022 (16:42) | This comment has been translated
Thanks a lot to everyone! |
| sent on October 25, 2022 (17:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I'm going a bit against the tide... The image is a graphic work that does not match the scientific plausibility, and does not resume the reality of today's sun. Vado un po' controcorrente... L'immagine è un lavoro grafico che non combacia con la plausibilità scientifica, e non riprende a realtà del sole di oggi. |
| sent on October 25, 2022 (17:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In what sense is it a graphic work?
According to this concept, the stacks of hours of exposure of the deep sky should also fall into this category, Giancarlo. No eye would see the nebulae as we see them in the astrophoto gallery... Just as no solar filter would show a disk as an H-alpha shooting system shows. In che senso è un lavoro grafico?
Secondo questa concezione, anche gli stack di ore di esposizione del cielo profondo dovrebbero rientrare in questa categoria, Giancarlo. Nessun occhio vedrebbe le nebulose come le vediamo nella galleria astrofoto... così come nessun filtro solare mostrerebbe un disco come lo mostra invece un sistema di ripresa in h-alfa. |
| sent on October 25, 2022 (17:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
If you tell me, it could instead be proposed on a dark background like this EP by Daniele Bonfiglio:
https://www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?l=it&bk=-6-&t=4192394
but on a subjective level, I find it pleasant even so with the yellow halo, suspending my disbelief and accepting that it is an artistic interpretation. On the other hand, Daniele also has versions in h-alpha with a different background, a sign that the possible interpretations may vary. Se mi dici, poteva invece essere proposta su sfondo scuro come questo EP di Daniele Bonfiglio:
www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?l=it&bk=-6-&t=4192394
ma a livello soggettivo, la trovo gradevole anche così con l'alone giallo, sospendendo la mia incredulità e accettando che si tratta di interpretazione artistica. D'altra parte anche Daniele ha versioni in h-alfa con sfondo differente, segno quindi che le possibili interpretazioni grafiche che puoi considerare più "realistiche" hanno pur sempre un margine di variazione. |
| sent on October 25, 2022 (17:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It's different. This is just a graphic composition that goes against science.
The applied external aura can have no scientific confirmation. What produces that glow on the moon?
The sun looks "bitten".
In addition, this morning's solar activity is not the one shown in the picture. I realize, however, that for the layman it may seem a spectacular photo.
But I recommend to see the other photos online and make some comparisons. No. È diverso. Questa è proprio una composizione grafica che va contro la scienza.
L'aura esterna applicata non può avere riscontro scientifico. Cosa produce quel bagliore sulla luna?
Il sole sembra "morsicato".
Inoltre l'attività solare di stamattina non sembra quella mostrata in foto. Mi rendo conto comunque che per i profani possa sembrare una foto spettacolare.
Però consiglio di vedere le altre foto presenti online e fare qualche confronto. |
| sent on October 25, 2022 (17:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Here is an example, taken from a friend (rather knowledgeable and known).
https://www.astrobin.com/full/i2rxed/0/?q=Sulcis2000 Qui un esempio, ripresa fatta da un amico (piuttosto ferrato e conosciuto).
www.astrobin.com/full/i2rxed/0/?q=Sulcis2000
|
| sent on October 25, 2022 (17:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
You're wrong Giancarlo, the solar activity in h alpha was this morning that after I from the original frame that is black and white I brought it to color and bringing the halo this is another thing. I suggest you take a look at the Solaractivity website.... Ti sbagli Giancarlo, l'attività solare in h alpha era questa stamattina che dopo io dal frame originale che è in bianco e nero l'ho portata a colori e apportando l'alone questa è un'altra cosa. Ti consiglio di dare un'occhiata al sito Solaractivity.... |
| sent on October 25, 2022 (17:27) | This comment has been translated
Wonderful |
| sent on October 25, 2022 (17:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In fact... I checked... Where do those bumps come from?
Maybe you just mirrored/overturned the image? Infatti... Ho controllato... Da dove vengono quelle protuberanze?
Magari semplicemente hai specchiato/ribaltato l'immagine?
Edit: cromosfera e protuberanze corrispondono al sole odierno, chiedo venia.
Tuttavia resto comunque dell'idea che l'immagine sembri il frutto di un “taglia e cuci” digitale.
L'alone applicato rende il tutto scientificamente non plausibile.
La foto che hai usato come avatar invece secondo me è molto più apprezzabile e coerente. |
user126778 | sent on October 25, 2022 (22:32) | This comment has been translated
I am speechless! |
| sent on October 26, 2022 (19:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Only congratulations :-o
Loris Solo complimenti
Loris |
| sent on October 26, 2022 (21:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Complimenting you is too little, I know, but, as Lino Banfi says, one word is too much and two are few 8-) :-P I
do not know astrophotography, but I urge the E P. immediate 8-)
Carlo Farti i complimenti è troppo poco, lo so, ma, come dice Lino Banfi, una parola è troppa e due sono poche  
Non me ne intendo di astrofotografia, ma sollecito l'E P. immediato
Carlo |
| sent on October 27, 2022 (11:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you so much Carlo. Grazie mille Carlo. |
| sent on October 08, 2023 (22:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
But that .... incredible!!!
Ma che .... incredibile!!!
|
| sent on October 09, 2023 (5:21) | This comment has been translated
|
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
1.5 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
