What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on September 29, 2011 (20:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
a nice close up
hello un bel primo piano
ciao |
| sent on September 29, 2011 (21:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
the origin of the light is a bit 'strange, so the projection of the shadow seems to come from underneath: I ruoterei 90 degrees times ... ;-) la provenienza della luce è un po' strana, così dalla proiezione dell'ombra sembra arrivare da sotto: io la ruoterei di 90 gradi orari... |
| sent on September 29, 2011 (21:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Given the location of the flower agree with the rotation, even for me the light I'm not crazy, hello ;-) Vista la posizione del fiore concordo con la rotazione, anche per me la luce non mi fa impazzire, ciao |
| sent on September 30, 2011 (10:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It seems you've rotated the photo to present the subject in an optimal position for reading. In this case, however, you want to light you want for the flower frame appears unreal.
The moth although well taken as maf, has the problem of too much light, it would be better if he was still inactive, shield, or compensate for adverse to soften the light. Sembrerebbe tu abbia ruotato la foto per presentare il soggetto in una posizione ottimale di lettura. In questo caso però vuoi per la luce, vuoi per il fiore il fotogramma appare poco reale.
Il lepidottero anche se ben ripreso come maf, ha la problematica di una luce eccessiva, meglio sarebbe stato schermarlo se era ancora inattivo, o compensare negativamente per attenuare la luce. |
| sent on September 30, 2011 (10:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
You are right, in fact I have rotated the image 90 degrees to make it more readable, not thinking about the light!
I should also have other shots with the light softer, maybe if there is someone decent I try to post it, because of the passage and valuable advice ;) Avete ragione, in effetti ho ruotato la foto di 90° per renderla più leggibile, non pensando alla luce!!
Dovrei avere anche altri scatti con la luce più tenue, magari se ce n'è qualcuno decente provo a postarlo, grazie del passaggio e dei preziosi consigli ;) |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
