JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on March 31, 2013 (23:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I'm sorry but overall the picture does not convince me for these reasons: High lights = loss of detail Crooked-shot to the right -Abnormal noise as if you had shot at high ISO -Lack of your intervention in underexposure
You can always post the shooting data and insert them in the appropriate fields? .. These provide useful information to other users allows them to enter into the spirit of better picture posted and understand your options in the stage of pre-release and support a more rational and objective comment. hello and good light, laurel scusami ma nel complesso l'immagine non mi convince per questi motivi: -alte luci = perdita di dettaglio -inquadratura storta a dx -rumore anomalo come se tu avessi scattato ad altissimi iso -mancanza di un tuo intervento nella sottoesposizione
Puoi postare sempre i dati di scatto ed inserirli negli appositi campi? .. Fornire questi elementi utili agli altri utenti permette loro di entrare meglio nello spirito della fotografia postata e comprendere le tue scelte nella fase del pre-scatto oltre a favorire un commento più ragionato e oggettivo. ciao e buona luce, lauro
sent on April 01, 2013 (6:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
First of all, thank you all for the steps. Lauro here shooting data. Lauro here shooting data (I will treasure your advice)
2013:03:29 08:33:12 Canon EOS 600D Aperture: f/16 Exposure: 1/400s Ev: 17 ISO equiv: 1250 Innanzitutto grazie a tutti per i passaggi. Lauro ecco i dati di scatto. Lauro ecco i dati di scatto ( farò tesoro dei tuoi consigli)
2013:03:29 08:33:12 Canon EOS 600D Aperture: f/16 Exposure: 1/400s Ev: 17 ISO equiv: 1250
sent on April 01, 2013 (8:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
When you have time please enter them in your every photo posted in entering your galleries and fill in the fields (including the lens used). This way you can use the service of personal statistics and research of this image for reflex or optical. If this is not a crop, from the data you have provided could then close to max F.8-F.11 and reduce the iso. Maf on the head. hello, laurel Quando hai tempo inseriscili in ogni tua foto postata entrando nelle tue gallerie e completando i campi (compresa l'ottica usata) . In questo modo potrai sfruttare il servizio di statistiche personali e la ricerca di questa immagine anche per reflex o per ottica. Se questo non è un crop , dai dati che ci hai fornito potevi quindi chiudere a f.8-max f.11 e ridurre gli iso . Maf sulla testa. ciao, lauro
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
3.5 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
