What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 20, 2021 (17:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello MaxG, if you did it with a 300 mm diameter you can squeeze it more that tube.
details have to come out of you galore.
don't hurt you, mine wants to be a constructive criticism :-) ciao MaxG, se l'hai fatto con un 300 mm di diametro puoi spremerlo di più quel tubo.
di dettagli te ne devono saltare fuori a bizzeffe.
non te ne avere a male, la mia vuole essere una critica costruttiva  |
| sent on October 20, 2021 (17:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you.. I know, it was the first light I gave to the tube purchased used and a little rearranged to extract the fire (it was too internal) and I had the Reflex; I was experimenting with the stability of the collimation during the various meridian flips, the stability of the focuser with the weight of the same in ocular projection and the ideal distance of the coma corrector .. the laziness of pulling out even the 224MC and the PC prevailed taking into account that there was also the sky that was quite painful .. I'll try next time. I put only 2Mpix s 8-) u 24x16mm instead of 1.2 on 5x3.. 8-) Grazie.. lo so, era la prima luce che davo al tubo acquistato usato e un pò risistemato per estrarre il fuoco (era troppo interno) ed avevo la Reflex; stavo sperimentando la stabilità della collimazione durante i vari meridian flip, la stabilità del focheggiatore con il peso della stessa in proiezione oculare e la distanza ideale del correttore di coma..la pigriza di tirar anche fuori la 224MC ed il PC ha prevalso tenendo conto che c'era anche il cielo che faceva abbastanza pena.. proverò la prossima volta. Ho messo solo 2Mpix s u 24x16mm invece di 1.2 su 5x3.. |
| sent on October 20, 2021 (19:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
try it as soon as possible, Jupiter is running away !!
do you want to miss this opportunity ??
next time take out the ASI and do a couple of shots on the two channels. do you have the two filters x infrared? provaci il prima possibile, giove sta scappando !!
vorrai mica perderti quest'occasione ??
alla prossima tira fuori la ASI e fai un paio di riprese sui due canali. ce li hai i due filtri x l'infrarosso? |
| sent on October 21, 2021 (8:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I'm just at the first weapons on the planetarium, more than on the rest .. I know that the 224 already has the integrated infrared filter, what filters are you talking about? Sono proprio alle prima armi sul planetario, più che sul resto.. so che la 224 ha già il filtro infrarosso integrato, tu di che filtri parli? |
| sent on October 21, 2021 (11:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
ir pass and ir cut. the first you can use in b/w acquisitions x reduce atmospheric turbulence and gain detail. the second in rgb x acquisitions get something more with colors.
me and process the channels separately then merge them with photoshop or other photo editing software.
try x believe ;-) 8-) ir pass e ir cut. il primo lo puoi usare in acquisizioni b/n x ridurre turbolenze atmosferiche e guadagnare dettagli. il secondo nelle acquisizioni rgb x ottenere qualcosa di più coi colori.
sommi ed elabori i canali separatamente poi li unisci con photoshop o altro software di fotoritocco.
provare x credere  |
| sent on October 22, 2021 (16:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Provero! thanks! Provero! Grazie! |
| sent on October 30, 2021 (12:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello MaxG I agree with Serafino that you can pull out more details from a 30cm, however as a first attempt it is not bad at all! Hello Daniel Ciao MaxG concordo con Serafino che si possono tirare fuori più dettagli da un 30cm, comunque come primo tentativo non è affatto male! Ciao Daniele |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
2.5 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
