RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Journalism/Street
  4. » try hasselblad swa

 
try hasselblad swa...

Prove Rolleiflex biottica f2.8 us

View gallery (11 photos)

try hasselblad swa sent on July 03, 2021 (21:40) by Musicapiccinini. 4 comments, 122 views.




1 person like it: Ben-G


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on July 03, 2021 (21:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Actually this is the 1954 Hasselblad SWA. Comparison to rolleiflex for the Biogon 38 mm I still did not find the right color film.

avatarsenior
sent on August 24, 2021 (12:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

In comparison to Rolleiflex, unless the obvious difference in focal length, what did you notice?
You did any tests with this SWA and Portra 400 ?
A kind greeting,
Ben

avatarsenior
sent on August 24, 2021 (14:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)










I are two very respectable fixed lenses so it only depends on the context. Then they are photos that must be printed I pass them to the scanner just to have a better view of the negative then I decide what to do. The scanner is the Epson 800 with its factory program but photographing on film without printing is a shame. It is still very funny and there is if in the end many use film and scanners to publish on social media ...

avatarsenior
sent on August 24, 2021 (23:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thank you... lovely the SWA... with all the signs of his experience... (also lying on books of equal value ...). Congratulations!
The photographs appear less incisive than those of the Rolleiflex... however, as you well say, "it is a shame not to print" and therefore very relative, if not improper, to give judgment on the digital scans of films ...
On the first photograph it is evident to me the absence of distortion that distinguishes the biogon 38 ...
Thanks again and ...
good light !!!
Ben


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me