What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on July 22, 2020 (12:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very very nice congratulations
A greeting Manlio. Molto molto bello complimenti
Un saluto Manlio. |
| sent on July 22, 2020 (12:29) | This comment has been translated
Thank you! |
| sent on August 03, 2020 (6:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Look, take what I write with pliers because it's my very personal opinion, but there has to be something wrong. Either that sensor needs a particular treatment in PP or other that I do not understand but the details are kneaded in almost every shot of this gallery. The urban legend that at medium distances the Tamron does not go bn not the shooting down because even the monstrous 400 2.8 seen here does not convince me. As long as they look at the size from FB they can be fine but when you look at them in HD come out the macagne. Excuse me sincerity, but I see it that way. I just do not understand why there are photographers who with that D500 get quality photos and others destroy the power of the expensive glass they use. Say hello. Senti ,prendi quello che scrivo con le pinze perchè è un mio parere personalissimo, ma ci deve essere qualcosa che non va.O quel sensore ha bisogno di un trattamento particolare in PP o altro che non capisco ma i dettagli sono impastati in quasi tutti gli scatti di questa galleria. La leggenda metropolitana che alle medie distanze il Tamron non va bn non la tiro giu perchè anche il mostruoso 400 2,8 visto qui non mi convince. Finchè si guardano alla dimensione da FB possono andar bene ma quando le guardi in HD vengono fuori le macagne. Scusami la sincerità ma io la vedo cosi. Non capisco proprio perchè ci sono dei fotografi che con quella D500 ottengono delle foto qualitativamente ottime ed altri distruggono la potenza dei costosi vetri che adoperano. Un saluto. |
| sent on August 03, 2020 (16:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I don't know, I didn't even touch this one, as it comes out of the raw is so, then I don't know if with the sensor of the d500 you have to do a big postproduction to make it acceptable, cmq both I can't do :-D - the jay was full screen, distance 10 meters Non lo so, non l'ho nemmeno toccata questa, come esce dal raw è così, poi non so se con il sensore della d500 bisogna fare una grossa postproduzione per renderlo accettabile, cmq sia non la so fare  - la ghiandaia era a tutto schermo, distanza 10 mt |
| sent on August 03, 2020 (19:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
An open topic now in the forum reminded me of a fundamental detail! These photos were taken at high temperatures and there is no solution of body and optical change or even postproduction. Unfortunately with migrants we have to accept compromises with hot currents and humidity and therefore all the sensors will be very bad. These jays live in barn, arid, dusty and hot environments, it's part of nature and we can't do anything about it. Different would be if their habitat was a shady forest or a beautiful meadow watered regularly and maybe hunt at dawn, none of that. Un topic aperto ora nel forum mi ha ricordato un dettaglio fondamentale! Queste foto sono state fatte a temperature elevate e non vi è soluzione di cambio corpo e ottica e nemmeno postproduzione. Purtroppo con i migratori dobbiamo accettare dei compromessi con correnti calde e umidità e quindi tutti i sensori saranno pessimi. Queste ghiandaie vivono in ambienti fienosi, aridi, polverosi e caldissimi, fa parte della natura e non possiamo farci nulla. Diverso sarebbe se il loro habitat fosse un bosco ombreggiato o un bel prato annaffiato regolarmente e magari cacciassero all'alba, niente di tutto ciò. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
2.5 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
