What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 23, 2019 (17:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Emmanuel, these are jpg "out of the canera"? Or did you work in pp a little bit? The yield seems remarkable to me but I do not believe in "miracles". Can you stand up to an FF?.... Opening at full resolution here on juza, it seems to me applied a sharp noise reduction with relative loss of detail. Can you confirm? Ciao Emanuele, questi sono jpg "out of the canera"? Oppure hai un po' lavorato in pp? La resa mi sembra notevole ma non credo ai "miracoli".... Possibile tenga testa ad una FF?.... Aprendo a piena risoluzione qui su juza, mi sembra applicata una forte riduzione rumore con relativa perdita di dettaglio. Puoi confermare? |
| sent on November 24, 2019 (16:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
They are JPEGs made from the Z50's 14-bit loss-free RAW, processed only with Nikon Capture NX 2 (latest version downloaded for Z50 compatibility).
Of course there was a bit of post-processing (noise filter, shadows, lights) there was but all things done on the fly inside Capture NX.
Anyway I tell you that with the D850 at that time (16.30) with 200-400-1.4x you have the micromove lurking, with the Z50 no.
The talk is that you can't compare the Z50 to an FX but the new Z-mount technology, with the brighter 55mm grafting, the new Expeed 6 processor and new improvements in the RAW are an extra step. And this can already be seen on the Z6 Z7 comparing them to the D750 and D850. Of course still to be improved in CONTINUOUS AF... but the future is now the Z mount. Sono JPEG realizzati dal RAW (compressione senza perdita a 14 bit) della Z50, elaborati soltanto con Nikon Capture NX 2 (ultima versione scaricata per la compatibilità con la Z50).
Certo un po' di post lavorazione (filtro rumore, ombre, luci) c'è stata ma tutte cose fatte al volo dentro Capture NX.
Comunque ti dico che con la D850 a quell'orario (16.30) con 200-400+1.4x hai il micromosso in agguato, con la Z50 no.
Il discorso e' che non puoi paraganorare la Z50 ad una FX ma la nuova tecnologia Z-mount, con l'innesto di 55mm piu' luminoso, il nuovo processore Expeed 6 e nuove migliorie in ambito del RAW sono una marcia in più. E questo si vede gia' sulle Z6 Z7 paragonandole a D750 e D850. Certo ancora da migliorare in AF continuo...ma il futuro ormai e' il Z mount. |
| sent on November 24, 2019 (16:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
That the future is Z is undeniable.
And the results of the various Z's look really good.
Your experience with the Z50 is proof of this.
I'll ask the easy question:
Today you think it's better to have the Z50 with paired "pro" DX optics (like 16-80, 17-55 f2. 8, 18-35 sigma f/1.8...) or the D750 with its 24-120? Che il futuro sia Z è innegabile.
Ed i risultati delle varie Z sembrano davvero buoni.
La tua esperienza con la Z50 ne è la riprova.
Te la pongo facile la domanda:
Oggi ritieni megliore la Z50 con abbinate ottiche "pro" DX (tipo il 16-80, il 17-55 f2. 8, il 18-35 sigma f/1.8...) oppure la D750 con il suo 24-120? |
| sent on November 24, 2019 (16:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Z50 and D750, Two non-comparable cameras, one DX and other FX.
The Z50 is an evolution of the DX so better than the D7500.
Certainly if you use Pro optics on the Z50 the results are great, and if not you need it for sport, the Z50 is perhaps better than the D500.
But I wouldn't give away D750 for Z50, maybe I'd replace it with a Z6.
Z50 e D750, Due fotocamere non paragonabili, una DX ed altra FX.
La Z50 e' un evoluzione del DX quindi meglio della D7500.
Certamente se usi ottiche Pro sulla Z50 i risultati sono ottimi, e se no ti serve per sport, la Z50 e' forse meglio anche della D500.
Ma non darei via D750 per Z50, magari la sostituirei con una Z6.
|
| sent on November 24, 2019 (16:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I use Z50 (as DX having the crop 1.5), Z6 for portraits, panoramas and D850 for wildlife and action. I am still considering switching to Z7 replacing the D850 for mirrorless problems in the accuracy of the burst in continuous AF...... D850 and D5 still unbeatable Io uso Z50 (come DX avendo il crop 1.5), Z6 per ritratti, panorami e D850 per wildlife ed azione. Sto valutando ancora di passare a Z7 sostituendo la D850 per i problemi delle mirrorless nella precisione della raffica in AF continuo......D850 e D5 ancora imbattibili |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
2.2 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
