What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 24, 2012 (13:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Say it all ... the bird was stuffed and you're the MF You did it with a ruler ... hours mica us want to believe that you are focused with a side? or perhaps it was the right one! ahahahahahahah great shot cleaning unreachable! Dilla tutta ... il pennuto era imbalsamato e tu la MF l'hai fatta con un righello... ora mica ci vorrai far credere che hai messo a fuoco con un laterale? o forse si, era il destro! ahahahahahahah bellissimo scatto pulizia inarrivabile! |
| sent on December 01, 2012 (20:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
really nice complimentoni davvero bella complimentoni |
| sent on December 01, 2012 (20:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
gorgeous as usual! splendida come al solito !!! |
| sent on December 01, 2012 (21:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice Bella |
| sent on December 01, 2012 (21:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
excellent photo ottima foto |
| sent on December 01, 2012 (21:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Looks like a model for stretches, beautiful shot. Sembra una modella per quanto si allunga, splendido scatto. |
user2626 | sent on December 01, 2012 (21:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
good ottima |
| sent on December 01, 2012 (21:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
As Max:-P Come Max. |
| sent on December 01, 2012 (21:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Wonderful great. Splendida bravissimo. |
| sent on December 01, 2012 (23:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
as always a fairy tale, I find only the background a bit 'too saturated.
Hello come sempre una favola, trovo solo lo sfondo un po' troppo saturo.
Ciao |
| sent on December 02, 2012 (9:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
wow! Excellent in everything!  Ottima in tutto! |
| sent on December 02, 2012 (9:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
ottimawow as always! come sempre ottima |
| sent on December 02, 2012 (14:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Photo gorgeous, with a higher resolution and detail you could also see if he has any broken bones ;-)
Hello
Foto stupenda,con una risoluzione ed un dettaglio maggiore si potrebbe vedere anche se ha qualche osso rotto
Ciao
|
| sent on December 02, 2012 (17:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you all for your comments welcome! For details thank the monster D800E is not about my! :-) Grazie a tutti per i graditi commenti!! Per il dettaglio ringraziamo il mostro D800E non è merito mio!! |
| sent on December 03, 2012 (12:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
now here we are! the detail of the feathers is great but not artificial, finalemnte can tame the beast ;-) ;-)
beautiful shot!
you put the hd version?
enrico adesso ci siamo! il dettaglio del piumaggio è ottimo ma non artificioso, finalemnte riesci a domare la bestiola
scatto splendido!!!
metteresti la versione hd?
enrico |
| sent on December 03, 2012 (15:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you Henry! I would like your comment! For the HD version did not put this time because the subject does not seem very slowly parallel to the sensor and the lower part with paw and tail sfocate.L 'I only posted the joke on the D800 otherwise I would have trashed! F11 is not even enough in these cases. The world is beautiful because it is different! there are those who fixed the sensors are fixed on the other side and PDC! are the implications of the disease (martinite). Excuse Grazie mille Enrico !! Al tuo commento ci tengo!! Per la versione HD non la metto stavolta perchè il soggetto non mi pare ben pian parallelo al sensore e la parte bassa con zampa e coda sono sfocate.L'ho postata solo per la battuta sulla D800 altrimenti l'avrei cestinata!! Non basta nemmeno f11 in questi casi. Il mondo è bello perchè è vario !!! c'è chi si fissa sui sensori laterali ed altri si fissano sulla PDC !! sono i risvolti della malattia (martinite). Scusatemi |
| sent on December 03, 2012 (17:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Rubacolor compliment you for your beautiful shots and 'taken for granted, and I that idea. In macros and sprinting to the martini you are a teacher and there is' only to learn.
Given the spirit of playful topic I had written a series of jokes with Adriano, but I prefer to say things in my own way if you let me, but if it bothers and must generate the usual controversy scrivimelo for mp gate and what I wrote. Believe me, I do so in good faith and for the sole purpose of agree on the principles. I do not think an OT view the caption to the photo.
We all agree that the fire and 'a plan and that has nothing to do with the depth' of field. Depending on the used diaphragm then has a given depth 'of that field in general and' 1/3 forward of the level of fire and 2/3 behind the plane of focus. I see the subject parallel to the sensor and then do the deding on:
your photo falls in front of the fire to the subject (frontfocus), we see very well on the perch and thanks to the depth 'of the field generated by the diaphragm to f11 you can still experience a good detail on the eye and on the wing more' close to the lens while martin and the rest of the 'out of focus. This is not to say that your D800E has starati side, 'cause you can not' judge from a single photo, I'm just saying if I believe you used the eye as a MAF in this specific case the module has taken perfectly. And I would add that if you were to notice that the phenomenon is repeated not 'say that this point AF behave differently from the others and then a small pair of good calibration machine / lens would solve it.
As for the jokes about shake I do not understand how do you make them for 2 reasons: 1) the photo and 'taken on the stand and1/100 if the subject 'still you should not see blur. 2) At this magnification you would not see even if there were, it would take a crop at 100% on the eye.
It remains a great shot with the detail where you need them to me to show that at the end of the handle and 'what counts, while the rest are often sterile speeches.
Hello
Gian Luca Rubacolor farti i complimenti per i tuoi splendidi scatti e' scontato, e mi accodo. Nelle macro e negli scatti ai martini sei un maestro e c'e' solo da imparare.
Visto lo spirito scherzoso del topic mi ero scritto una serie di battute con Adriano, ma preferisco dirti le cose a modo mio se mi permetti, se invece la cosa infastidisce e deve generare le solite polemiche scrivimelo per mp e cancello quanto ho scritto. Credimi lo faccio in buona fede e ai soli fini di metterci d'accordo su dei principi. Non lo ritengo un OT vista la didascalia alla foto.
Siamo tutti d'accordo che il fuoco e' un piano preciso e che non ha niente a che fare con la profondita' di campo. A seconda del diaframma usato poi si ha una data profondita' di campo che in genere e' 1/3 davanti al piano di fuoco e 2/3 dietro al piano di fuoco. Io vedo il soggetto parallelo al sensore e quindi faccio delle deduzioni:
nella tua foto il fuoco cade davanti al soggetto (frontfocus), si nota molto bene sul posatoio e grazie alla profondita' di campo generata dal diaframma a f11 si percepisce ancora un buon dettaglio sull'occhio e sull'ala piu' vicina alla lente mentre il resto del martino e' fuori fuoco. Con questo non voglio dire che la tua D800E ha i laterali starati, perche' non si puo' giudicare da una sola foto, dico solo che se come credo hai usato l'occhio come punto di MAF in questo caso specifico il modulo non ci ha preso perfettamente. E aggiungo che se ti dovessi accorgere che il fenomeno si ripete non e' detto che questo punto AF si comporti in modo diverso dagli altri e quindi una piccola taratura dell'accoppiata macchina/lente risolverebbe la cosa.
Per quanto riguarda le battute sul micromosso non capisco come si fa a farle per 2 motivi: 1) la foto e' scattata sul cavalletto e a 1/100 se il soggetto e' fermo non si dovrebbe vedere micromosso. 2) A questo ingrandimento non si vedrebbe nemmeno se ci fosse, ci vorrebbe un crop al 100% sull'occhio.
Resta un grande scatto con il dettaglio li dove serve secondo me a dimostrazione che il manico alla fine e' quello che conta, mentre il resto sono spesso discorsi sterili.
Ciao
Gian Luca |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
