What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 06, 2012 (19:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
a little noisy but as an idea is really okay! un filo rumorosa ma come idea è veramente okay! |
| sent on November 06, 2012 (19:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
alas I agree .. a little 'because the iso 500d are felt .. a little 'because it was free hand and slightly underexposed .. a little 'because I opened a lot of shadows.
and I ask you a technical question. the photo is calibrated with my monitor and when I see the shadows on the laptop has very open and contrasted .. which pulls out all the flaws. with which the monitor you're looking at? aimè concordo.. un po' perchè gli iso della 500d si fanno sentire.. un po' perchè era a mano libera e leggermente sottoesposta.. un po' perchè ho aperto molto le ombre.
e ti faccio una domanda tecnica. la foto è calibrata col mio monitor e quando la vedo sul portatile ha le ombre molto aperte e contrastate.. il che tira fuori tutti i difetti. con che monitor la stai guardando? |
| sent on November 06, 2012 (20:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I am looking at a 22 "HP calibrated and known too excessive noise on the parts" open. "perhaps the only thing you can do is a" Gaussian Blur "light on the parts where nn are details in order to eliminate a little noise. io la sto guardando con un 22" della HP calibrato e noto anche io una rumorosità eccessiva sulle parti "aperte". forse l'unica cosa che puoi fare è un "controllo sfocatura" leggerissimo sulle parti dove nn ci sono dettagli così da eliminare un poco di rumorosità. |
| sent on November 06, 2012 (20:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Blur tool, intensity '5%, a brush of appropriate size, the steps where needed and the noise goes away! Strumento sfuoca, intensita' 5%, pennello di adeguate dimensioni, lo passi dove serve e il rumore se ne va! |
| sent on November 06, 2012 (21:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
then you might as well use noise ninja:-D I have now uploaded .. if only there was the option RELOAD allora tanto vale utilizzare ninja noise  ormai le ho caricate.. se soli ci fosse l'opzione RELOAD |
| sent on November 06, 2012 (21:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
the rush to publish a funny thing .. I correct the shot and if it's worth reloading ..
I realized now that noise ninja gave his usual sharp too .. do I pick the raw and put all of those maxxi .. the other made with tripod should be more free from problems of noise la fretta di pubblicare gioca brutti scherzi.. correggo il tiro e se vale la pena ricarico..
mi sono accorto ora che ninja noise ha dato il suo solito eccessivo sharp.. facciamo che riprendo il raw e le riposto tutte quelle del maxxi.. le altre fatte con cavalletto dovrebbero essere più esenti da problemi di noise |
| sent on November 06, 2012 (22:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Yeah, but if it comes to noise localized on parts blurred or underexposed and smooth surfaces, you avoid applying it on any photo. That's it.
The noise reduction programs are bastards' cause, they work well within the 1200/1500 pixels on the long side and if you use them automatically, are likely to cause side effects, or removing the detail in the shadows or enhancing the sharpness of the lights.
However, if there were no one should invent them! ;-) Si, ma se si tratta di rumore localizzato su parti sfocate o sottoesposte e su superfici uniformi, si evita di applicarlo su tutta la foto. Tutto qui.
I programmi di riduzione rumore sono × perche', lavorano bene entro i 1200/1500 pixel sul lato lungo e se li utilizzi in automatico, rischiano di provocare effetti collaterali, o tolgono il dettaglio sulle ombre o accentuano l'acutezza sulle luci.
Comunque se non ci fossero bisognerebbe inventarli! |
| sent on November 07, 2012 (0:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I really the first to open less shadows in the raw and calibrated detail / noise
thanks for the advice faccio veramente prima ad aprire meno le ombre nel raw e calibrare dettaglio/noise
grazie per i consigli |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
1.3 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
