What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 28, 2012 (0:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I see blurry as HDR, I read that you changed the diaframmmi and not the time, why? hello ;-) la vedo poco nitida come HDR, leggo che hai variato i diaframmmi e non il tempo, perchè? ciao |
| sent on October 28, 2012 (13:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I started using the camera in manual mode 15 days ago ... :-|
It 's true is unclear, but I think it is because of the change in aperture but the tripod "poor" and the absence of the shutter.
Ho iniziato ad utilizzare la reflex in manuale 15 giorni fa... 
E' vero sia poco nitida ma penso non sia colpa della variazione dei diaframmi ma del treppiede "scarso" e dell'assenza dello scatto flessibile.
|
| sent on October 28, 2012 (13:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
yes, the diaphragms are an error here, you have to use a fixed iris closed 16 or so, setting the hyperfocal focus and only vary the exposure time. best 5/6 shots in increments of + -1 stop (time) or 3 + -2 stops, 100 asa ok, if you can make the shot with the mirror raised in self-timer to 2 seconds is the difference meglio.vedrai hello - ) si, i diaframmi sono un elemento di errore qui, devi usare un diaframma fisso chiuso 16 o poco più, impostazione per iperfocale del focus e variare solo il tempo di esposizione. meglio 5/6 scatti con incrementi di +-1 stop (tempo) o 3 di +-2 stop, 100 asa ok, se puoi fare lo scatto con lo specchio sollevato in autoscatto di 2 sec è meglio.vedrai la differenza ciao |
| sent on October 28, 2012 (15:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you so much advice. As soon as I can - and weather permitting - try again.
PS. What does "setting the hyperfocal focus", is the only thing I did not understand :-| Grazie infinite dei consigli. Appena posso - e tempo permettendo - riproverò.
PS. cosa significa "impostazione per iperfocale del focus", è l'unica cosa che non ho capito |
| sent on October 28, 2012 (16:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It seems a HDR pushed too crazy and ... see dominant magenta color here and there and pumped unreal.
Lack of sharpness due to:
Excessive-closure of the diaphragm to that eighth that gave rise to the diffraione
-Shake caused by a non-use of a remote command (cost 12 € approx) and a tripod unstable
Hello and good light, laurel
Mi sembra un HDR troppo spinto e impazzito ... vedi dominanti magenta quà e là e colori pompati irreali.
Manca di nitidezza a causa di:
-chiusura eccessiva del diaframma per quell'ottica che ha fatto emergere la diffraione
-micromosso causato da un non utilizzo di un comando remoto (costo 12 euro c.a.) e di un treppiede instabile
Ciao e buona luce, lauro
|
| sent on October 28, 2012 (18:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
in the sense that you have to focus on using the hyperfocal for maximum depth of field so manually, with a 18f, so wide you have to focus sufficiently even at 1 m for all on fire, do not go beyond f18. hello nel senso che devi mettere a fuoco usando l'iperfocale per avere la massima profondità di campo quindi in manuale, con un 18f, per questo grandangolo devi mettere a fuoco sufficentemente anche a 1 mt per avere tutto a fuoco, non andare oltre al f18.ciao |
| sent on October 28, 2012 (21:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks to both. Grazie ad entrambi. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
