RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Wildlife (no birds)
  4. » The shot of the deer

 
The shot of the deer...

Fauna

View gallery (19 photos)

The shot of the deer sent on October 05, 2012 (13:35) by Fabio Faustini. 22 comments, 3844 views.

con Canon EF 2.0x III, 1/20 f/8.0, ISO 800, hand held.

Un altro panning. Non c'è la precisione che avrei voluto e forse il fuoco è anche caduto sul fianco posteriore anzichè sull'occhio, ma mi piace comunque il dinamismo di questa foto, quindi condivido e attendo i vostri commenti... Ciao





PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




user505
avatar
sent on October 05, 2012 (13:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Beautiful, but to be considered a successful panning missing, in my opinion, some clarity on the subject.

Hello

avatarjunior
sent on October 05, 2012 (14:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Monty, technically I agree, however I was wondering if it can be considered an interesting image.
As for me were a bit 'to the limit because of these technical shortcomings, but in addition to my wanted to hear other opinions ...
Hello

avatarsenior
sent on October 05, 2012 (14:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

For me it is a very nice photo. Is that for me the technique is not always essential in a click ....

user505
avatar
sent on October 05, 2012 (17:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Fabio,
I personally find very beautiful your recent photos of the two deer while panning in this photograph seems a bit 'unfinished.
Incomplete in the sense that it is an interesting image, but would require greater clarity.
In any case (especially for this kind of picture) Everyone has their own opinion and mine is questionable as all the others.

Greetings

avatarjunior
sent on October 05, 2012 (19:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Monty, I appreciate it very much!
Hello

avatarsenior
sent on October 07, 2012 (21:11)

Great shot.

avatarjunior
sent on October 07, 2012 (23:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thank you :-) Jahromi

avatarjunior
sent on October 08, 2012 (9:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

technical or non-technical .. I like very much. hit!

avatarjunior
sent on October 08, 2012 (11:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Cladepo

avatarsenior
sent on October 08, 2012 (11:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I like it a lot, also because I know how difficult it is to bring these beautiful animals and catch them shots so effective

avatarsupporter
sent on October 08, 2012 (12:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Fabio,
I like it but I agree in part the concerns more than anything else because it is a middle way .. or the most focus is the face or move is even more so the fire does not count.
It 'sa perplelssità I also photos of me that I like, like this, in spite of this doubt ...

avatarjunior
sent on October 08, 2012 (12:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Ilfana, thanks Memy

avatarsenior
sent on October 08, 2012 (12:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I agree with Monty that you can not exactly define panning but in my opinion "is" a rough artistic as such may or may not like.

It 's true, you say so myself (and not looking at the preview I noticed too), too bad the fire on the side and not on the eye but I would say ;-) and this feeling of spinning movement and how the transmitter and in my opinion a picture that conveys a feeling is a beautiful photo and a beautiful experiment :-)

avatarjunior
sent on October 08, 2012 (12:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Chiara, thanks for the comment, you have depth one of the topics that interest me most about the effectiveness of the images :-)

avatarsenior
sent on October 08, 2012 (20:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The idea is great but the shot is not really a true panning seen that the subject is also moved in the head area.
It would be worth trying, perhaps with horses or other, to find the right time to make better ;-)

avatarjunior
sent on October 08, 2012 (22:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Serpero, in fact it is to be improved. I also wonder if the 300 duplicate is the most suitable target, perhaps with 100-400 that is more agile than it would have been easier, so I do not think that in a pan of this type the subject can never be so firm that you can appreciate the difference quality between the two lenses ...
Hello

avatarjunior
sent on October 09, 2012 (1:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Fabio,
great shot, even if the subject is out of focus :-(.
I wanted to ask if you've noticed some difficulty in focusing on distant subjects / barely visible with the 300 + 2x Doubler III.
Thanks
Ina

user4780
avatar
sent on October 09, 2012 (11:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

... "Fire side"!!? ... "You can not exactly define a panning"!!? ... Then ... else you found that does not suit you ...? !!

But let me pleasure ... how do you judge trick that splendid shooting under these points ...?!?

For once that within this section you see something creative ... and not the classic stuffed animal ... we are talking about the usual and boring parameters of judgment ...?!

If you want to ... and if Fabio agrees ... we can replace "panning" with the description ... "inspired creative" ... so at least we stand the problem of focus ...

Now judge the picture only on the basis of these criteria trivial ... MAF, sharpness, etc. ... maybe you need to comment on another type of photography ... but not questa!

Dear Fabio, in the end I make my warmest congratulations ... hoping in the future to continue to see more of your work on gender!

Hello, Daniel!







avatarjunior
sent on October 09, 2012 (14:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Gwbal with 7D +300 f / 2.8 + 2x III for me the f is very fast and I would say accurate, even at long distances. Sometimes it hangs up and there's just to and I think this is one of the limitations of the 7D. I happened to trash the shots x this reason, after which I set af point to spot and things have improved. Of course, it becomes difficult over long distances centered on the eye with moving subjects, but if there is little light I fear that the other systems are even more risky. Maybe someone has suggestions about ... ;-)

Thanks Daniel, I appreciate your point of view and I'm glad you abia a look at this photo centered on his ability to communicate, before the technique. Having said that I personally believe to be fair and honest critical and self-critical, if you do it constructively. Soyour opinion as that of others help me to grow. I asked them, I appreciate them and I think they are in this sense "generous", because everyone takes his contributing to the growth of others ... In fact, I think this shot is interesting but also improved the prospect of development of my photographic research
Then again a sincere thanks to you and all :-)
Hello

avatarjunior
sent on October 10, 2012 (21:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Really good shot, be happy, very nice I really like.
Bravo hello!


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »



Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me