What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on August 26, 2017 (23:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good night, good, hello G bel notturno,bravo,ciao G |
user81257 | sent on August 27, 2017 (12:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A good first attempt (first true?) Obviously there are several defects:
- stars not really pointers
- Soil that looks almost pasted and not sharp
- that lighthouse on the mountain that I would heavily cloned (it looks very much too much)
It's not easy, but with a good workout you can (you're already in good shape). Un buon primo tentativo (primo vero?), ovviamente ci sono vari difetti:
- stelle non proprio puntiformi
- terreno che sembra quasi incollato a posteriori e poco nitido
- quel faro sulla montagna che avrei pesantemente clonato (attira lo sguardo decisamente troppo)
Non è facile, ma con un buon allenamento si riesce (sei già a buon passo). |
| sent on August 27, 2017 (12:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
This is exactly the first attempt. As I told you I did a lot of tests: for me 2500 iso and 30 seconds are the optimum (in this situation).
The stars do not look particularly streaked, indeed. I am satisfied with the development of the milky way and the colors I have released (ACR only).
As far as light is concerned (it is an abandoned hotel lighthouse who knows why for that very night) I do not seem annoying, it looks but not in a negative way in my opinion.
Thank you very much for the passage Marco Si esatto primo tentativo. Come ti dicevo ho fatto vari test: per me 2500 iso e 30 secondi sono l'optimum (in questa situazione).
Le stelle non non sembrano particolarmente striate, anzi. Sono soddisfatto dello sviluppo della via lattea e dei colori che ho fatto uscire (solo ACR).
Per quanto riguarda la luce (è un faro led di albergo abbandonato chissà per quale motivo proprio quella sera) non mi pare fastidiosa, attira lo sguardo ma non in maniera negativa secondo me.
Grazie mille per il passaggio Marco |
| sent on August 27, 2017 (13:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The lighthouse draws its gaze because it falls just down the line of the Milky Way ...
For the rest it seems to me a good night with a not too pumped development ... according to me you can also try at 3200 iso.
Il faro attira lo sguardo perché cade proprio lungo la linea della via lattea...
Per il resto mi sembra un buon notturno con uno sviluppo non eccessivamente pompato...secondo me puoi provare anche a 3200 iso.
|
| sent on August 27, 2017 (14:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The file is in fact ale ;-) you can try Il file c'è in effetti ale  si può tentare |
| sent on August 27, 2017 (14:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good job Philip.
Hello flower. :-) Bel lavoro Filippo.
Ciao fiore. |
| sent on August 27, 2017 (17:53) | This comment has been translated
Thanks a lot! |
| sent on August 28, 2017 (23:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Philip waiting for my first Zeiss I am studying astrophysics, good composition but you have used too long time. To get pointy stars, you do not have to exceed 15. "For those who do astrophotography, you have to do a good post-production job, otherwise you may have shaded or burned shadows, but you're on the right track. Filippo in attesa del mio primo Zeiss sto studiando astrofotografia, composizione buona ma hai utilizzato un tempo troppo lungo. Per avere stelle puntiformi non bisogna superare 15". Naturalmente per chi fa astrofotografia deve fare un buon lavoro d post produzione altrimenti si rischia di avere delle ombre troppo chiuse o delle luci bruciate. Però sei sulla buona strada. |
| sent on August 29, 2017 (8:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks to the Riccardo passage, I was aware that with 30 seconds I would have been at the limit but the slight streak does not bother too much in my opinion. Was the first attempt :-D at the end of September we repeat Grazie del passaggio Riccardo, ero consapevole che coi 30 secondi sarei stato al limite però la leggera striatura non infastidisce troppo a mio avviso. è stato il primo tentativo  a fine settembre ci riproviamo |
| sent on August 29, 2017 (10:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I cut a hair on the underside and, as I said, that lighthouse is in the wrong place.
For the rest a nice attempt to start .. is a genre where you need to do many tests and stages the bones to find the ideal combination. ;-) Taglierei un pelo la parte sotto e, come già detto, quel faro è proprio nel posto sbagliato.
Per il resto un bel tentativo per iniziare.. è un genere dove serve fare molte prove e fasi le ossa per trovare la combinazione ideale. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
2.5 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
