RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Macro and Flora
  4. » Philaeus chrysops female

 
Philaeus chrysops female...

Salticidae

View gallery (19 photos)

Philaeus chrysops female sent on September 15, 2012 (19:21) by Mattfala. 23 comments, 3646 views.

1/200 f/8.0, ISO 100, hand held.

Rioch Riconar 55mm f2.2, anello di inversione, tubi di prolunga. 1,6:1 + crop per composizione. Flash Yongnuo yn-565ex in modalità manuale. Diffusore artigianale. Unine di due scatti. #Arachnida #JumpingSpider





PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 241000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsupporter
sent on September 15, 2012 (19:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Compliments. It is not easy to get a free hand to these images, especially with these magnifications.

avatarjunior
sent on September 15, 2012 (19:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

is not a menemerus semilimbatus :-) is a female Philaeus chrysops ;-) ... I see that you begin to practice with the stak :-)

avatarsenior
sent on September 15, 2012 (20:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Pigi and Mimmo :)

Mimmo, also this is a female Philaeus chrysops? They are two different individuals photographed in my garden.
Thanks for the identification! Now stand corrected! :-)
Yeah, I'm starting to experiment with stacking and with the luminosity mask ;-)

avatarjunior
sent on September 15, 2012 (20:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

is the same specimen and sex ;-)

avatarsenior
sent on September 15, 2012 (20:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I've now seen pictures of Philaeus chrysops male: it's beautiful! I hope to find someone!

avatarjunior
sent on September 15, 2012 (22:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I've seen big boy is about 1.3 cm wow! is beautiful

avatarsenior
sent on September 16, 2012 (11:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Well come on, if I find the females while there will be boys :-)

avatarsenior
sent on September 16, 2012 (11:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

very nice detail mattfala great big beautiful picture just a bit of background noise but recoverable. I like hello flavio

avatarjunior
sent on September 16, 2012 (15:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

it is said that males run well .. :-( last summer I had a female for several weeks in the garden but I had never seen the male, I've seen this summer, the big boy:-D

avatarsenior
sent on September 16, 2012 (16:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Grzie Guz :)

Mimmo, to breed the male will have to be that :-) (unless you are parthenogenetic, but I do not think this is the case!), Then maybe it is more difficult to find because after mating eat it: - D

avatarjunior
sent on September 16, 2012 (19:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

to reproduce the male there's got to be
but it is not said that they are close :-/ go around hunting then disperse, when they meet the male makes the ritual:-P

avatarsenior
sent on September 17, 2012 (0:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Then cross your fingers! :-)

avatarjunior
sent on September 17, 2012 (0:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

;-)

avatarsenior
sent on November 27, 2012 (8:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Gram nice picture, but that lens is?
Compliments. Hello. Joe

avatarsenior
sent on November 27, 2012 (10:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello, thank you for passing Joe.
It 's an old optical mount pentax-k, lent to me by a friend of mine. I used inverted and mounted on two sets of extension tubes.
A short take a Pentax 50 7.1 to be used in this way.

avatarsenior
sent on November 27, 2012 (23:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks for the info, but what did you Canon like me, where did you get the ring inversion?
Since I know nothing, I can fit a 85 or a 35 f 1.8 f 2 reversed, with extension tubes on my 650?
Thank you in advance for your answer.,
Are you a big, beautiful photos really.,
Hello. Joe.

avatarsenior
sent on November 28, 2012 (0:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I want to overcome arachnophobia thanks to people like this. I'm too nice. But this should not be in portrait and fashion? :-D Hello, Nick.

avatarsenior
sent on November 28, 2012 (10:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I want to overcome arachnophobia thanks to people like this. I'm too nice.

True! I am very curious and easy to approach. Sometimes you also jump on the machine:-D


Thanks for the info, but what did you Canon like me, where did you get the ring inversion?

The rings of inversion can take them on ebay. From Hong Kong pay them a stupid, over € 3, but they put us a month or more to arrive, otherwise you can take within the European Union (for these things are usually the best prices from the UK) and pay the 6 € -7; italy less than 10-12 € I've never found, but maybe you are lucky :-)

Since I know nothing, I can fit a 85 or a 35 f 1.8 f2 reversed, with extension tubes on my 650?

Sure, you can mount them, but are not the best. The 85 forget it, it is a focal length too long and would have no advantage to reverse it: higher magnifications are obtained by inverting focal children.
The 35 is nice, but you have no control of the diaphragm. You should attach the lens, set the aperture, hold down the button to preview the depth of field and in the process remove the lens: in this way the iris stays locked open until you have set the goal mountains again "straight "the machine is on. Every time you want to change the aperture you will need to repeat the process!
If you want to start doing this kind of photos you should look for a lens "vintage" manual iris, a 28, 35 or 50mm.

avatarsenior
sent on November 29, 2012 (9:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thank you, super professional response.
I start looking. ;-)
Last thing and then you do not toll on most, promised to six distance from the front lens with the parameters of this photo (aperture and focal tube) from your boyfriend? Logically, with 35'd have higher magnification but still less distance?!?
But using a macro with the pipes do not get the same magnification?
What is the motivation of the lens reversed?
You are a great, and thanks again.
Hello.
Joe. :-D
Ride on ebay, found nothing, I put: ring inversion,
What should I write to him?


avatarsenior
sent on November 29, 2012 (17:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

how far you are from the front lens

I do not remember, but about 7-8 cm


In order logic with 35'd have higher magnification but still less distance?!?

Exactly ;-)
With a 28mm you are about 4-5 cm away from the front lens (which would be back :-))


But using a macro with the pipes do not get the same magnification?
What is the motivation of the lens reversed?

I've never tried but I could not. I will try! :-)
However, I would not have control of the diaphragm as the steal of extension that I have are the ones from a few Euros without automation! To maintain control of thediaphragm should only spend about € 100 for a set of tubes, with much less I did it all! (Two sets of tubes and lens) :-)

Stroll on ebay, found nothing, I put: ring inversion,
What should I write to him?

Try to write "52mm eos", I quickly found this: the price is good ;)

PS: take a walk in the galleries Mimmo Macaluso , has many great shots! ;-)


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »



Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me