JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on August 20, 2011 (1:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The pleasant blur. I'm sorry but the whole does not convince me for these reasons: - Cut the ear - Maf inaccurate (see eye) - Diaphragm .. was probably more appropriate f.5, 6 - Overexposure .. +1 why? ok that is almost a backlight but the hair is white and the part with little detail is just the opposite and head ... enough +0.333. hello and good light, laurel Piacevole lo sfocato . scusami ma nel complesso non mi convince per questi motivi: - taglio dell'orecchio - maf imprecisa (vedi occhio) - diaframma .. era molto probabilmente più indicato f.5,6 - sovraesposizione.. perchè +1 ? o.k. che è quasi un controluce ma il pelo è bianco e la parte con poco dettaglio è proprio la fronte e la testa ... bastava +0,333. ciao e buona luce, lauro
sent on August 20, 2011 (8:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
thanks for the comment ElleEmme. I chose the full aperture because he played and roam in an environment that the background was not the most photogenic. More photos without compensation, including white wall and saw the white hair on gray 'lcd. To focus the af had to chase and the original is good, less noticeable here because I have a little 'messed with scaling. If there was more space above the ear actually earned it. grazie del commento elleemme. Ho scelto la tutta apertura perchè giocava e girovagava in un ambiente che come sfondo non era dei più fotogenici. Altre foto senza compensare, tra muro bianco e pelo bianco le vedevo grigie sull' lcd. Per la messa a fuoco avevo l'af a inseguimento e l'originale è buono, qui si nota meno perchè ho un po' pasticciato col ridimensionamento. Se c'era più spazio sopra l'orecchio effettivamente ne guadagnava.