What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 20, 2016 (16:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello, very nice photo of the flight .....
X As for the 'optical believe that being of many years ago nn has a lightning-fast AF .... maybe postresti update the' optics. Hello and good photos. Ciao, foto al volo molto bella.....
X quanto riguarda l' ottica credo, che essendo d molti anni fa nn abbia un AF fulmineo....magari postresti aggiornare l' ottica. Ciao e buone foto. |
| sent on October 20, 2016 (19:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Luca,
I'm planning to upgrade the optical but I can not afford the latest 70-200 Nikon home. On the other hand, with a Tamron 150-600 and its opening 5-6,5 would miss it blurred and the creaminess of this.
For some time, I realize that the 200mm is also short for the birds and animals in general, and I was tempted by the multiplier, however, it will further slow down the AF.
Well, I am just going. I focused on a perspective dated but quality. Maybe it was not the right calculation.
Some advice? Grazie Luca,
Sto pensando di aggiornare l'ottica ma non posso permettermi l'ultimo 70-200 di casa Nikon. D'altra parte, con un Tamron 150-600 e la sua apertura 5-6,5 perderei lo sfocato e la cremosità di questa.
Da tempo, mi rendo conto che il 200mm è anche corto per gli uccelli e gli animali in genere ed ero tentato dal moltiplicatore che, però, rallenterebbe ulteriormente l'AF.
Insomma, sono proprio deciso. Avevo puntato su un'ottica datata ma di qualità. Forse non era il calcolo giusto.
Qualche consiglio? |
| sent on October 20, 2016 (20:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I thought right at sigma ... if you can the sports series.
It costs an d more Po, but Tt stuff .... :-) Pensavo proprio al sigma...se puoi la serie sport.
Costa un Po d più , ma è Tt roba.... |
| sent on October 20, 2016 (20:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks, I'll vedermelo Grazie, vado a vedermelo |
| sent on October 20, 2016 (22:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Maybe not sell it ..... a 2.8 is always useful, and then how slow they speak very good :-) Magari venderlo no.....un 2.8 è sempre utile, e poi come lenti ne parlano molto bene |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
