What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on August 30, 2016 (8:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I give the like because the composition piace..ma me it seems that the stars are not in focus ;-) Ti do il like perché la composizione mi piace..ma mi sembra che le stelle non siano a fuoco  |
| sent on August 30, 2016 (9:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Mh then, I have a little 'cropped, but I do not know, I ask one thing in MP;)
Thanks anyway. Mh allora, ho un po' croppato ma non saprei, ti chiedo una cosa in MP ;)
Grazie comunque. |
| sent on August 30, 2016 (9:10) | This comment has been translated
ok |
user93277 | sent on August 30, 2016 (10:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
To have done it with a D750 seems a bit poor in quality. Nice shot Per averla fatta con una D750 mi sembra un pò scarsa in qualità. Bello scatto |
| sent on August 30, 2016 (10:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The photos of the problem is that the stars are not in focus. Hello!
Il problema della foto è che le stelle non sono a fuoco. Ciao!
|
| sent on August 30, 2016 (10:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ it seems a bit poor in quality „
Yes, I believe that the three peaks depends on the F2.8 high ISO (my mistake) while for the sky I have to try to figure out what can be depended on it. I have to take a test and see if I busted just focus (not believe) or something else.
I only regret that the first chance of the night was shot at three peaks haha ??I wanted to get more prepared.
Thanks for the compliment anyway;)
“ the stars are not in focus „
But here, too generic fuzzy or talk about movement of stars? " mi sembra un pò scarsa in qualità"
Si, credo che per le tre cime dipenda dal F2.8 ad alti ISO (errore mio) mentre per il cielo devo cercare di capire da cosa possa essere dipesa la cosa. Devo fare un test e vedere se ho sballato di poco la messa a fuoco (non credo) oppure qualcos'altro.
Mi spiace solo che la prima occasione di scatto notturno fosse alle tre cime ahah avrei voluto arrivarci più preparato.
Grazie del complimento comunque ;)
" le stelle non sono a fuoco"
Ma ecco, sfocate generico o parlate anche di movimento delle stelle? |
| sent on August 30, 2016 (11:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
however, I'll try to ripostprodurla because I fear I have walked the hand of some things even I;)
You go on to find the various defects and how to remedy the consigliatemi forthcoming. comunque proverò a ripostprodurla perchè temo di aver calcato la mano su alcune cose anche io ;)
Voi andate avanti a trovare i vari difetti e consigliatemi come poter rimediare alla prossima uscita. |
| sent on August 30, 2016 (12:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A classic! Un classico! |
| sent on August 30, 2016 (12:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I think you forgot to change the focus from the three peaks to the stars Secondo me hai dimenticato di cambiare la messa a fuoco dalle 3 cime alle stelle |
| sent on August 30, 2016 (12:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ I think you forgot to change the focus „
Actually I have not changed ... On the three peaks (as I said in the MP) I held the extreme as it was the only point at which appeared and disappeared confirmation of focus. For the stars as I should adjust it?
I thought they went both of infinite being distant elements.
“ A classic! „
Oh yes, I wanted to avoid this framing "trivial" but in the mental chaos that I thought I had to keep myself on a simple thing and try. " Secondo me hai dimenticato di cambiare la messa a fuoco"
Effettivamente non l'ho cambiata...Sulle tre cime (come ti dicevo in MP) ho tenuto l'estremo in quanto era l'unico punto nel quale compariva e spariva la conferma di messa a fuoco. Per le stelle come avrei dovuto regolarla?
Credevo andassero entrambi sull'infinito essendo elementi lontanissimi.
" Un classico!"
Eh si, avrei voluto evitare questa inquadratura "banale" ma nel caos mentale che avevo ho pensato di mantenermi su una cosa semplice e provare. |
| sent on August 30, 2016 (15:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Here I pumped a little 'sharpness and deleted a few stars, side by side, and seemed a move.
I do not understand exactly, seeing more photos of Juza, in what sense are fuzzy stars.
The case can not be the crop? Many photos look super on fire but if the stars are enlarged "moves."
Clearly not looking for excuses haha ??I would just understand what's wrong so I can fix.
Qui ho pompato un po' la nitidezza e cancellato alcune stelle che, affiancate, sembravano una e mossa.
Non capisco di preciso, vedendo altre foto su Juza, in che senso sono sfocate le stelle.
La causa non può essere il crop? Molte foto sembrano super a fuoco ma se vengono ingrandite le stelle sono "mosse".
Chiaramente non cerco scuse ahah vorrei solo capire bene cosa non va per potermi correggere.
|
| sent on August 30, 2016 (15:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
You've probably done something wrong because at 14 mm is easy to go into hyper focale..nella photos you've repeated it shows even better the lack of focus on the stars Probabilmente hai sbagliato qualcosa perché a 14 mm è facile andare in iper focale..nella foto che hai riproposto si vede ancora meglio la mancanza di fuoco sulle stelle |
| sent on August 30, 2016 (15:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ok so let's talk just right blur (Unclear board)? no blur.
Having put the ring to infinity think I could feel comfortable ... it could possibly be that the infinite is (as we said) just before the infinite (the extreme of the ring)?
It is not that anyone can turn around a magnification to 100% of a portion of stars in focus? At least I understand what I did wrong ... maybe seeing him understand better. Ok quindi parliamo proprio di sfocatura giusto (bordo poco nitido)? non di micromosso.
Avendo messo la ghiera su infinito credevo di poter stare tranquillo...eventualmente potrebbe essere che l'infinito sia (come dicevamo) poco prima dell'infinito (all'estremo della ghiera)?
Non è che qualcuno riesce a girarmi un ingrandimento al 100% di una porzione di stelle a fuoco? Almeno capisco dove ho sbagliato...vedendolo magari capisco meglio. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
1.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
