What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on August 22, 2016 (15:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
very beautiful
Gionskj Molto bella
Gionskj |
user33208 | sent on August 22, 2016 (15:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
apart from the fact that for a while that problem is not fotografoe because it is not the kind I love, I have found me too photographing flowers, with macro lens, this even in the days of film, and I must say that before making the photo I enjoyed spray them with water to create an effect, with droplets, which I really liked. cmq are beautiful, congratulations. a parte il fatto che per problemi è da un pò che non fotografoe perchè non è il genere che amo,mi son trovato pure io a fotografare fiori ,con obiettivi macro,questo ancora ai tempi della pellicola e devo dire che prima di fare la foto mi divertivo a spruzzarli con l'acqua per creare un effetto,con le goccioline,che mi piaceva molto. sono cmq belle,complimenti. |
| sent on August 22, 2016 (16:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks to the interventions.
@Villa Arrigo: I agree that any water droplets on the flowers can emphasize the aesthetics and attract the most attention of the viewer. I prefer not to act "artificially" to that effect.
The photographers who take care competently genre macro know so work with mastery. I'm not an expert photographer: - |
If there were droplets on flowers I photographed are dew, rain or post-watering.
Good day, Mat Grazie per gli interventi.
@Villa Arrigo: concordo sul fatto che eventuali gocce d'acqua sui fiori possano enfatizzarne l'estetica ed attirare maggiormente l'attenzione di chi le guarda. Io preferisco non agire "artificialmente" in tal senso.
I fotografi che curano con competenza il genere macro sanno così operare con maestria. Io non sono un fotografo esperto 
Se ci fossero goccioline sui fiori da me fotografati sono di rugiada, di pioggia o post-innaffiatura.
Buona giornata, M.a.t. |
user33208 | sent on August 22, 2016 (16:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
dew would be the best, you're right. still I come to see you, until I can not take back my only fun is seeing altrui.come photos you use, good light Mat la rugiada sarebbe il massimo,hai ragione . verrò ancora a trovarti,fino a quando non potrò riprendere il mio unico divertimento è vedere le foto altrui.come si usa,buona luce M.a.t. |
| sent on February 17, 2017 (8:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I like the focus notch in the center of the flower. Mi piace la messa a fuoco ricavata al centro del fiore. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
