What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 10, 2016 (16:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The only thing I like is not the blurred foreground part, for the rest nothing to say ;-)
David L'unica cosa che non mi piace è la parte sfuocata in primo piano, per il resto nulla da dire
Davide |
| sent on October 10, 2016 (17:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Here, as the person at the center and also I like the diaphragm chosen, I find only too present in front of the blurred, I would remove it away at least half '. However nice idea. Ecco, qua la persona al centro mi piace e anche il diaframma scelto, trovo solo troppo presente lo sfuocato davanti, io ne toglierei via almeno la meta'. Comunque bella idea. |
| sent on October 10, 2016 (21:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Cut the blurred and reduce it at least in half, try a more courageous conversion that the photo is interesting. Taglia lo sfocato e riducilo almeno a metà, tenta una conversione più coraggiosa che la foto è interessante. |
| sent on October 10, 2016 (23:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The photo as far as I know (from wikipedia: -D) is the architect's plans ... In this congratulations! For the development I exaggerated a bit the contrast to give greater anguish observer ;-)! La foto per quanto ne so (da wikipedia ) rappresenta l'intenzione dell'architetto...In questo complimenti! Per lo sviluppo avrei esagerato un po il contrasto per dare maggior angoscia all'osservatore! |
| sent on October 11, 2016 (11:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very interesting, beautiful b / n used
I'll recommend you to cut at least half of the focus in the foreground Molto interessante, bello il b/n utilizzato
Ti consiglierei anch'io di tagliare almeno la metà dello sfuocato in primo piano |
user81257 | sent on October 13, 2016 (10:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
If I had taken away (even in pp) low blurred hand, it would be a picture with all the trimmings. It handled well in the BN, well composed and the content is strong.
However, after watching several times, my eye always falls on the blurry foreground, obscuring the rest.
Marco. Se avessi tolto (anche in pp) la parte bassa sfuocata, sarebbe stata una foto con i fiocchi. Gestita bene nel BN , composta ottimamente ed il contenuto è forte.
Però, dopo averla osservata varie volte, l'occhio mi cade sempre sulla parte sfuocata in primo piano, oscurando il resto.
Marco. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
1.3 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
