What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on May 31, 2013 (12:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Not very clear, otherwise nice capture
hello Non molto nitida, altrimenti bella cattura
ciao |
| sent on May 31, 2013 (12:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It is I am Mr. Nikon .....
Rofl ... :-D È io sono il signor Nikon .....
Rofl... |
| sent on May 31, 2013 (12:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It is not an owl Non è un gufo |
| sent on May 31, 2013 (14:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
and what is it? e cos'è? |
| sent on May 31, 2013 (15:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Definitely a diurnal bird of prey, where you have taken?
However, the picture is not sharp you have to focus on the subject's eye the next time Sicuramente un rapace diurno, dove l'hai scattata?
Comunque la foto non è nitida devi mettere a fuoco l'occhio del soggetto la prossima volta |
| sent on May 31, 2013 (15:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
the photo I made in brazil ..
definitely will not be super in focus, but at the time I was "only" a canon 1000d so it was definitely the best machine with which to take .. but nevertheless I feel cmq satisfied! ;-) la foto l'ho fatta in brasile..
sicuramente non sarà super a fuoco, ma all'epoca avevo "solo" una canon 1000d per cui non era sicuramente la migliore macchina con cui scattare..ma ciononostante mi ritengo cmq soddisfatto! |
| sent on May 31, 2013 (17:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ but at the time I was "only" a canon 1000d „
Even with the Canon 1000D you can make great pictures, the camera body is definitely not the problem! ;-) What optic did you use?
For identification sicuramenete is not an owl, but probably a hawk of some kind, though a diurnal bird of prey.
Hello, Ivan " ma all'epoca avevo "solo" una canon 1000d"
Anche con la canon 1000D si possono fare ottime foto, il corpo macchina non è sicuramente il problema! Che ottica hai usato?
Per l'identificazione non è sicuramenete un gufo, ma probabilmente un falco di qualche tipo, comunque un rapace diurno.
Ciao, Ivan |
| sent on May 31, 2013 (17:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
it seems like a female Sparrowhawk, I agree with Ivan the x 1000d ..... with the shooting data you can 'understand!
hello Daniel mi sembra uno Sparviere femmina , concordo con Ivan x la 1000d.....con i dati di scatto si puo' comprendere meglio !!
ciao Daniele |
| sent on June 01, 2013 (13:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I think ke Luigi cia 'got it right! mi sa ke Luigi cia' azzeccato! |
| sent on June 01, 2013 (17:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
also for me female sparrowhawk anche x me sparviere femmina |
| sent on June 02, 2013 (12:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ Even with the Canon 1000D you can make great pictures, the camera body is definitely not the problem! What optic did you use?
„
I agree, and in fact I used it for almost 4 years and really gave me a lot of satisfaction as well as great shots, but cmq have a body rather than another can make a difference, especially in certain areas. Even the lens that I used was not very good .. it was a Sigma 70-300 APO DG.
“ with the shooting data you can 'understand! „
Willingly put the shooting data, but unfortunately a bit of time in this part in the shooting data can only put the camera bodies and the goals you have written in your kit on the site, and saw that the body and the lens in question now I sold them not possor more flow, and so I left blank all the data ..: fconfuso: " Anche con la canon 1000D si possono fare ottime foto, il corpo macchina non è sicuramente il problema! Che ottica hai usato?
"
concordo, e anzi l'ho usata per quasi 4 anni e mi ha dato davvero tantissima soddisfazione oltre che bellissimi scatti, ma cmq avere un corpo piuttosto che un altro può fare la differenza, specie in certi ambiti. Anche l'ottica che avevo usato non era un granché..era un Sigma 70-300 APO DG.
" con i dati di scatto si puo' comprendere meglio !!"
Metterei volentieri i dati di scatto, ma purtroppo da un po di tempo a questa parte nei dati di scatto puoi mettere solo i corpi macchina e gli obiettivi che hai scritto nel tuo corredo sul sito, e visto che il corpo e l'ottica in questione ormai li ho venduti non posso più inserirli e per cui ho lasciato in bianco tutti i dati.. |
| sent on October 07, 2013 (22:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
if it were a sparrow, it would be female, but male, because of the reddish-brown color of the chest, the female is more gray or a young man. the photo is not perfect but still enjoyable. hello Alberto se fosse uno sparviere, non sarebbe femmina, bensì maschio, dato il colore marroncino-rossastro del petto, la femmina è più grigia o un giovane. la foto non è perfetta ma comunque piacevole. ciao Alberto |
| sent on October 08, 2013 (4:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I also have a sigma 70-300 and max focal sharpness and 'poor, if we add the fact that it is not' stabilized and that the shooting was done, I presume cm ² in a forest or in a poorly lit the result and 'also acceptable. Ho anch'io un sigma 70-300 e alla max focale la nitidezza e' scarsa, se ci aggiungi il fatto che non e' stabilizzato e che lo scatto sia stato fatto, presumo in una foresta o cmq in un luogo poco luminoso il risultato e' anche accettabile. |
| sent on October 08, 2013 (14:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Gianlu, that's exactly what happened!
Then of course I had a 7d +70-300 L instead of 1000d +70-300 scrausissimo sigma .. I guess I would have pulled off something better .. ;-) Grazie Gianlu, è esattamente andata così!
Poi certo avessi avuto una 7d+70-300L invece della 1000d+70-300 sigma scrausissimo..immagino avrei tirato fuori qualcosa di meglio.. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
