RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Landscape (wilderness)
  4. » Sunrise in Caorle

 
Sunrise in Caorle...

Primi Passi

View gallery (5 photos)

Sunrise in Caorle sent on June 13, 2012 (0:12) by Drugo77. 9 comments, 2121 views.

at 16mm, 1/4 f/18.0, ISO 100, tripod. Caorle, Italy.

Alba al mare - Caorle (VE) Bracketing 3 Photo (+\- 1,0)





What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarjunior
sent on June 13, 2012 (9:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Last Sunday in Caorle (VE) attempt to Alba but the sky was too overcast.
I have other shots from this place, but it seemed less worse.
C & C always welcome, be ruthless as well :)

avatarsenior
sent on June 13, 2012 (11:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Well, you need not just be ruthless from ;-)
The sky was what it was, but I used to hang a nd the sea a bit more soft, and I straightened hair a perspective distortion to prevent the church and the bell hung dried

avatarjunior
sent on June 13, 2012 (12:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Snowlover the passage ;-)
I do not have ND filters (I could think of buying one, I'm trying to learn quietly with the 'gear that I then move on to take something specific, I'm still using a tripod from 35 €: D)
to see how the distortion as the merger of 3 shots I made with Photomatix and some aggiustatina in PS and I do not think PM systems from only the lens distortion.
This shot I do not mind but I try to understand through the comments what I could improve both during shooting, components, diaphragms etc.. both during PS.
Hello

avatarsenior
sent on June 13, 2012 (12:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Really a beautiful sky and beautiful also the point of shooting!

Congratulations!

Hello and good photos! :-D

avatarjunior
sent on June 13, 2012 (13:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Henry for the ride.
Good photos to you too :-)

avatarsenior
sent on June 13, 2012 (15:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Drugo77: it is quite easy, work on the final file and change the perspective from one of the commands of PS (Free Transform or Transform-Perspective ...)
Something like this ... ;-)




avatarjunior
sent on June 13, 2012 (16:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Snowlover Thanks for the advice, yesterday it was late and I had not noticed the distortion of the church and bell tower fconfuso:.
To experience your advice to always use this function in the landscape or as in this case only if the sides of the 'image there is some structure that emphasizes more the lens distortion.
Thanks again

avatarsenior
sent on June 13, 2012 (16:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

For your experience advice to always use this function in the landscape or as in this case only if the sides of the 'image there is some structure that emphasizes more the lens distortion


It is not to be used always, it depends on shot to shot. Usually depends mainly on the point of recovery, by tilting the lens, and the focal length used .. if you are using a wide as in this case it is easy that there is no distortion, but does not always have to be corrected. I personally I rate the shot at the end, if I see that the horizon is not perfectly straight intervene, as well as when there are buildings or buildings with parallel lines.
Rate each case and tries to make the situation as natural as possible. Ps sometimes the distortion effect is also wanted (fisheye) and is not evil.

avatarsenior
sent on March 09, 2013 (4:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

that church should be photographed inside and at night. It 's really magic :)
(The picture is pleasant for me: I agree sull'aggiustata the falling lines and maybe give it a stronger footprint image: or brighter or darker or ... well you know. Well is a bit 'anonymous. ND filter? no I beg you, play with two or three pictures but then only use it when the sun is at 1km from the earth. effects of silk-fog water is full internet and are boring)


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me