What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 25, 2015 (18:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
File with a minimum of post production.
I personally like best.
File con un minimo di post produzione.
A me personalmente piace di piu.
|
| sent on November 26, 2015 (1:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
nice bella |
| sent on November 26, 2015 (4:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice shot!!!
:-) Bello scatto!!!
 |
| sent on November 26, 2015 (6:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
beautiful Bella |
| sent on November 26, 2015 (7:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very beautiful. Molto bella. |
| sent on November 26, 2015 (10:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I prefer the original, the colors are more 'real !! Beautiful shot !! Preferisco quella originale,i colori sono piu' reali!!Bello scatto!! |
| sent on November 26, 2015 (11:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
apart from the colors I have to say that the canon is necessaria.quando pp Olympus had the baked jpeg were already beautiful.
when I went in I noticed that the canon jpeg were worse and you just had to shoot in RAW.
when you're shooting in RAW it is obvious that a servant pp.
The thing I notice is a good cleaning of the file without pp.
comparing me to win that developed even have to say that Charles is right on the colors.
interesting :-) a parte i colori devo dire che in canon la pp è necessaria.quando avevo olympus i jpeg sfornati erano già belli.
quando passai a canon notai che i jpeg erano peggiori e si doveva per forza scattare in raw.
quando scatti in raw è ovvio che serva una pp.
la cosa che noto è una buona pulizia del file anche senza pp.
il confronto per me lo vince quella elaborata seppur debba dire che Carlo ha ragione sui colori.
interessante |
| sent on November 26, 2015 (11:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I never tripped in Jpeg with my Canon, I have always taken in RAW and I think I can be happy with the result.
“ I was the Olympus jpeg baked were already beautiful. „
I too have had the Olympus and I agree with you Steff, the colors were very real. :-P
“ the thing I notice is a good cleaning of the file without pp. „
It is true, but not always so, the lighting conditions were very favorable, I can also say that the Canon 400mm F5.6 is a good combination with the 7d. ;-)
Non ho mai scattato in Jpeg con la mia Canon, ho sempre scattato in RAW e penso di poter essere contento del risultato.
" quando avevo olympus i jpeg sfornati erano già belli. "
Ho avuto anch'io l'Olympus e sono d'accordo con te Steff, anche i colori erano molto reali.
" la cosa che noto è una buona pulizia del file anche senza pp. "
Si e vero, ma non sempre è cosi, le condizione di luce era molto favorevole, posso anche dire che il canon 400mm F5,6 è una bella accoppiata con la 7d.
|
| sent on November 26, 2015 (12:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
ITA, especially the processed version although a wire saturated
Vale Ottimo scatto, soprattutto la versione elaborata anche se un filo satura
Vale |
| sent on November 26, 2015 (14:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
beautiful photos, detail and astonishing colors compliments Franco, a greeting bellissima foto, dettaglio e cromie stupente complimenti Franco , un saluto |
| sent on November 26, 2015 (14:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Both beautiful, original would reduce only the noise that produced the post I see too hot but without noise, good day. Belle entrambe, all'originale ridurrei solo il rumore, quella post prodotta la vedo troppo calda ma senza rumore, buona giornata. |
| sent on November 26, 2015 (15:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I always shot in RAW with all parameters to zero pictures without contrast and sharpness are now in your car if you have already set parameters sharpness saturation and contrast is clear that it can not serve the PP beautiful photos io scatto sempre in raw con tutti i parametri a zero le foto sono senza contrasto e nitidezza ora se nella tua macchina hai gia impostato dei parametri saturazione nitidezza e contrasto è chiaro che non puo servire la PP bella foto |
| sent on November 26, 2015 (15:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ I always shot in RAW with all parameters to zero pictures without contrast and sharpness are now in your car if you have already set parameters sharpness saturation and contrast is clear that it can not serve the PP beautiful photos „
If I set the parameters that you say Massimo in Lightroom lose them all and I use Lightroom ... it can apply only if the use of Canon's software, however also my car and set everything to zero ... I prefer to work with the RAW file . " io scatto sempre in raw con tutti i parametri a zero le foto sono senza contrasto e nitidezza ora se nella tua macchina hai gia impostato dei parametri saturazione nitidezza e contrasto è chiaro che non puo servire la PP bella foto "
Se io imposto quei parametri che dici tu Massimo in Lightroom li perdo tutti e io uso Lightroom...può valere solo se uso il software della Canon, comunque anche la mia macchina e settato tutto sullo zero...preferisco lavorare io il file RAW. |
| sent on November 26, 2015 (15:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
But you Franco, which do you prefer? Ma tu Franco, quale preferisci ? |
| sent on November 26, 2015 (15:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ But you Franco, which do you prefer? „
I like this post ;-) then produced for taste: -D " Ma tu Franco, quale preferisci ? "
A me piace quella post prodottapoi gusti sono gusti |
user11529 | sent on November 26, 2015 (17:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great nice shot, I prefer to light the post-produced ... hello Piergiorgio Gran bel scatto,preferisco per la luce quella post-prodotta...ciao Piergiorgio |
| sent on November 26, 2015 (18:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
That post has produced much better, excellent ;-) Quella post prodotta è decisamente meglio, ottima |
| sent on November 26, 2015 (19:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Quoto above .. Quoto sopra.. |
| sent on November 26, 2015 (23:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It 'clear that with a little post production is better, but the original file is not bad
Nice shot
Marco E' chiaro che con un pò di post produzione è meglio ma il file originale non è male
Bello scatto
Marco |
| sent on November 27, 2015 (11:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you all for your comments. :-P :-P Grazie a tutti per i vostri commenti. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
2.5 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
