What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on May 28, 2012 (19:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Greetings Lauro, but here a little against the sun, but it very well 'action ;-) Un saluto Lauro, qui invece un pò contro sole ma rende benissimo l' azione  |
| sent on May 28, 2012 (19:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the ride and comment Tornado. In fact, I saved the sky and I had no problems with over-wing. 1/8000sec. ... are too many :-| next time I'll keep the lowest 8-) Hello and good life, laurel Grazie del passaggio e commento Tornado. In effetti ho salvato il cielo e non ho avuto problemi con il sopra-ala . 1/8000sec. ... sono davvero troppi  la prossima volta mi terrò più basso  Ciao e buona vita, lauro |
| sent on May 29, 2012 (8:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In the pictures of planes if there is no movement of the propeller gives the impression of seeing a model portrait in plastic instead of a real aircraft. With the equipment that you can use long exposure times (1/20 or down from there, the stabilizer of the 300 allows it) to get the desired effect of blur on the propeller. The plane you picture, for a fan, it is a piece of living history.
Greetings.
Marco. Nelle foto di aerei se manca il movimento dell'elica si ha l'impressione di vedere ritratto un modellino in plastica anziché un aereo vero. Con l'attrezzatura che hai puoi usare tempi lunghi (1/20 o giu di lì, lo stabilizzatore del 300 te lo permette) per ottenere l'effetto di mosso desiderato sull'elica. L'aereo che hai ritratto, per un appassionato, è un pezzo di storia vivente.
Saluti.
Marco. |
| sent on May 29, 2012 (8:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the ride and welcome comment marco_f., I1/20sec. Seem excessive, taking four minutes the camera freehand shooting with a 780mm 5kg of weight, I agree that the margin would have been enough to reduce the iso. hello and good light, laurel Grazie del passaggio e gradito commento marco_f., i1/20sec. Mi sembrano eccessivi tenendo 4 minuti la reflex a mano libera scattando con 5kg di peso a 780mm , concordo che il margine l'avrei avuto bastava ridurre gli iso. ciao e buona luce, lauro |
| sent on May 29, 2012 (11:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In my experience 1/250 is more than enough 1/20 is too much, shake definitely lurking, but I below 1/400 with my equipment not push me ever since except for a few shots from the blur. Per mia esperienza 1/250 è più che sufficiente 1/20 è troppo, micromosso decisamente in agguato, io però al di sotto di 1/400 con la mia attrezzatura non mi spingo mai perchè salvo pochissimi scatti dal micromosso. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
