RCE Foto






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Paesaggio Naturale
  4. » sunset Ricou

 
sunset Ricou...

LANDSCAPES2

View gallery (21 photos)

sunset Ricou sent on May 17, 2012 (0:01) by Fbog. 12 comments, 768 views.

at 29mm, 4 sec f/22.0, ISO 100, tripod.

Fusione Manuale di 5 RAW : sono alle prese con il Manual Blending "estremo" non sono mai convinto al 100% dei risultati finali che ottengo. Mi piacerebbe leggere qualche critica e consiglio costruttivo in merito a questa tecnica applicata in maniera manuale e non con Software alla Photomatix. Il mio intento è quello di ottenere un risultato il più reale possibile che si discosti dall' HDR.



4 persons like it: Jacopo94, Lorez, Matteo.Cantoro, Riki


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 198000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on May 17, 2012 (7:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

a beautiful fish to fry blending manually without knowing English (at least for me)
cmq the photo I do not mind .. I think I see a few alone on the mountain tops
click pleasant for me :)

avatarjunior
sent on May 17, 2012 (8:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Cabbages I did not realize where they are? Do you mean a profile too soft peaks?

Thank you so much for passing

avatarsenior
sent on May 17, 2012 (9:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

surely you can see a little 'alone in the mountains (the tops left darker than the rest of the mountains and the ridge to the right darker towards the sky), which, however, perceives those who are particularly unaccustomed to the technique of manual blending in my opinion.
I too am in your situation, that is not to be fully satisfied with the blend I do, many times the light of the photo is strange to me, I've seen the screens be improved by using light to fix the highlights after the merger.
in this photo, for example, it seems to me unnatural light the top of the sky, that is too light or the top of the sky or vice versa, to explain. I would try to darken a bit 'on the first floor, just a moment without losing detail to smooth the light of the photo.
scusa x messed up the comment ;-)
hello
diego

avatarsenior
sent on May 17, 2012 (12:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I know just a little bit of blending on the crest of the hill right in the mountains instead just do not see ... I've done more than a good job ... I'm trying to improve this aspect, but if I could have have a result like this would be very happy:-D
With regard to the discrepancy between the light of heaven and the first floor called by diego, sincermanete I do not seem diego .. sure is a thousand times more talented and experienced than me, but in the sense I do not think that that is a problem found in I repeat ... this is my personal opinion more than questionable, but it's what I think.
In any case, nice picture!
hello
Fabio

avatarsenior
sent on May 17, 2012 (13:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Francis,
for light quoto Diego, I do not know, however, whether the sky or the foreground to darken .. probably the light captured during shooting was that .. As Diego I see a slight unevenness in the brightness of the sky along the ridge to the right (even if that light could be due to the position of the sun). Above the hut, in the middle of the frame, there is a slight loss of definition of the peaks.
This by looking at the shot with a critical eye, the overall picture is very beautiful especially in the composition.
All the best,
Joseph

avatarsenior
sent on May 17, 2012 (14:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Do you mean a profile too soft peaks?

I mean even the hill to tell the truth ... but the keyboard has written what he wanted :-)

avatarjunior
sent on May 17, 2012 (16:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

to begin to thank you all for taking the time

I answer all David, Diego, Joseph and Fabio:

I find that your statements are correct and located between the 'other correspondence with the doubts I had.

The montage high in Sx and the crest to right I have created problems even on the LEFT aer thought I got a good result.

At the moment my question prncipale and 'this: the ridges and mountains had to be darkened further by creating more sparazione with the first floor?

And another doubt 'that the light on top of which I am in agreement with the fact that not separate, you want' cause you too dark 'cause too light, with the rest.

I probably would have had to increase the contrast and brightness withinept in the foreground to left and darken the lawn in front of the house in order to concentrate the 's attention observer from the first floor to behind the mountains where the sun sets.

thanks in any way at all I think that in a few days postero 're' s image magazine. sorry for any mistakes but ono the cell!



avatarsenior
sent on May 17, 2012 (21:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello ... Among the blend have mentioned others.
The problem can not find it in brightness, but in clear greenish tint on the whole shooting.
Very visible on the foreground, but also of all the stones left on the tops and the sky.
Taking values ??in the channel in LAB, some neutral areas, such as the stone at the bottom center and right, have negative values ??(-4/-6) in some places you also get to -8.
If the fix is ??greatly improved. ;-)

avatarsenior
sent on May 17, 2012 (21:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Valter you're a great eye for Margulis ehh:-D, there was something that did not convince .. these are really informative post ;-)

avatarsenior
sent on May 17, 2012 (21:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

:-D
Giuse haha, I've calibrated the eye to comment on this shot:-D

avatarsenior
sent on May 17, 2012 (22:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I just bought a new monitor (I have to get ..) now I have to study the LAB

avatarjunior
sent on May 17, 2012 (23:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Valter feel great tomorrow and let you know I incremntato probably raising the yellow green a bit 'everywhere! :-(

thank you very much for the tip ... ;-)

PS I always forget to give a contollata a, b ...



Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me