test with d800 105 2.8 VR

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Portrait and Fashion

31.8 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

Viaggi nel mondo View gallery (6 photos)

test with d800 105 2.8 VR sent on April 25, 2012 (18:19) by Alberto. 12 comments, 954 views.

, 1/4 f/20.0, ISO 100, tripod.

D800 105VR F/20 iso 100 treppiedi Ho l'impressione che questo mio 105 VR non sia perfettamente nitido!! Potreste dirmi, per favore, se mi sbaglio o è corretta la mia impressione?

View High Resolution 31.8 MP

2 persons like it: Max Abberline, Siragusa.v

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Rubacolor

sent on April 25, 2012 (18:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Mha! It 'hard to tell if the fault is 105! F 20 then is a critical diaphragm, you lifted the mirror? you have turned off the VR? The tripod and head are stable?

Alberto

sent on April 25, 2012 (19:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I scattatto well as F20 f13 and f16 and also I did not notice significant differences. The tripod is stable enough, the VR was turned off and the shot was made in live-timer. :-)
Do you think these are micro vibrations?

Ringhjos

sent on April 25, 2012 (20:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Try re-running the snap, raising the mirror and selecting the exposure postponed! If the result is the same, then it is possible that your 105 may be the least sharp! I see in your card that you are equipped with camera bodies as a shop! :-D .... to be sure that the 105 is not super performance you should test it with the other bodies, always on a tripod, with stand up mirror, Vr off and on exposure postponed! Anyway f20 aperture is quite closed, so consider that as well.

Alberto

sent on April 25, 2012 (20:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I will do as you advise me! Meanwhile, a big thank you in advance! :-) I'll let you know :-) ;-)
Hello

Sauro

sent on April 27, 2012 (16:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Alberto, frankly I got your feeling, try using a body with a lower resolution, I had a camera with 6MP now I have a D80 with 10MP and in certain situations I regret that by 6.

Alberto

sent on April 27, 2012 (18:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Sauro, I will make another attempt:
The D800 allows me to fine tune the lens.
I Armero with holy patience and if you will get positive results will let you know.
As for the high or low resolution of the camera I think, but I could be wrong, that a high proportion of pixels (36mil.) in a FF sensor should provide greater clarity and detail. :-)

Rubacolor

sent on April 27, 2012 (18:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I think he was referring to ringh likely starature of the camera body and not the number of pixels! Not creso that you succeed better with 6 shots of a 10 .. perhaps for the web nom known difference but if you go to enlarge you know it. Try to open the large version of this shot with the same equipment, Alberto!
www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?cat=singola&t=130554

Alberto

sent on April 27, 2012 (20:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

In fact, the more I watch this shot (fantastic) www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?cat=singola&t=130554 me most is to throw everything in the air!
But it is possible and acceptable that one spends thousands of euro in hopes of getting quality results at a certain level and, by contrast, seems to back off? :-D:-D:-D :-( :-( :-| :-|

Rubacolor

sent on April 28, 2012 (13:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Quiet! you'll see that you solve the problem! Meanwhile, for some hints, then maybe all ports in service!

Alberto

sent on April 28, 2012 (14:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Rubacolor, thanks for the support ....... hope for the best!
;-) :-| :-(

Enface58

sent on August 29, 2012 (20:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

the urge to touch it with your hands and feel its sweet scent bravissimoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

Antonio Guarrera

sent on September 15, 2012 (20:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

To be f20 and then diffraction for me is not bad. Have you tried to print it? You'll see that the detail is everything

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.