What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on August 08, 2011 (9:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful, congratulations shooting is truly remarkable. The subject is piccollissimo will be 4 mm from end to end. Bravissimo. Bellissima, complimenti lo scatto è davvero notevole. Il soggetto è piccollissimo, sarà 4 mm da capo a capo. Bravissimo. |
| sent on August 08, 2011 (10:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
too good.
sin for the rear that is not in focus.
: ( troppo buono.
peccato per il posteriore che non è a fuoco.
:( |
| sent on August 08, 2011 (19:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice composition, colors and blurred.
Back-focus because the imperfect parallelism floor sensor - subject.
You were close to the edge of the diaphragm more?
hello and good light, laurel Piacevoli la composizione, le cromie e lo sfocato.
Posteriore non a fuoco perchè per il non perfetto parallelismo piano sensore - soggetto.
Avevi margini per chiudere di più il diaframma?
ciao e buona luce, lauro |
| sent on August 08, 2011 (21:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
si.infatti in another shot I set f11 and I had everything in focus but the antennas had moved and were covered by pianta.in this case I used f9 1/20 iso 640.
you must also considereare that these individuals have a wedge shape and it is difficult to fire them all especially if like me you are not practical and are reluctant to close too.
wrong you learn :)
si.infatti in un altro scatto avevo impostato f11 e avevo tutto a fuoco ma le antenne le aveva spostate ed erano coperte dalla pianta.in questo caso ho usato f9 1/20 iso 640.
devi considereare anche che questi soggetti hanno una forma a cuneo ed è difficile averli tutti a fuoco specie se come me non sei ancora pratico e sei riluttante a chiudere troppo.
sbagliando si impara :)
|
| sent on August 11, 2011 (20:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In these cases helps a lot perfect parallelism.
Reflex that you used and what optics?
hello and good light, laurel In questi casi aiuta tantissimo il perfetto parallelismo.
Che reflex hai utilizzato e con quale ottica?
ciao e buona luce, lauro |
| sent on August 12, 2011 (1:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I used the d90 and sigma 105.
I will try to write all the shooting data from now on ..
are important ho usato la d90 e il sigma 105.
cercherò di scrivere tutti i dati di scatto da ora in poi..
sono importanti |
| sent on August 15, 2011 (21:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello, I think there are parts not perfectly focused like a lot, depth and three-dimensionality to the subject, good Ciao, a me che ci siano delle parti non perfettamente a fuoco piace molto, da profondità e tridimensionalità al soggetto, bravo |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
