What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 241000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on April 22, 2012 (19:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
very nice indeed beautiful, uncommon entity and not readily available molto bella, anzi bellissima, soggetto non comune e di non facile reperibilità |
| sent on April 22, 2012 (19:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
beautiful the subject is cropped? to 5.6 should not be in focus at least the other eye? bello il soggetto, è croppata? a 5.6 non dovrebbe essere a fuoco almeno l'altro occhio? |
| sent on April 22, 2012 (19:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good point of recovery, the colors, the focus, the composition and maf. Being a front shot I would have preferred that you includessi pdc in the second eye closed most of the diaphragm. hello and good light with little wind, laurel Buoni il punto di ripresa, le cromie, lo sfocato, la composizione e la maf. Essendo una ripresa frontale avrei preferito che tu includessi nella pdc anche il secondo occhio chiudendo di più il diaframma. ciao e buona luce con poco vento, lauro |
| sent on April 23, 2012 (0:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
thanks to all. no the picture is not cropped. The photo was taken with a 60 mm macro and extension tube. probabilmemnte although to 5.6 the depth of field was really very limited, so as not to have to fire the second eye. perhaps would do so even if the installation was only a little 'more than cut. I hope to have the opportunity to introduce ourselves again. :-) grazie a tutti. no la foto non è croppata. La foto è stata scattata con il 60 mm macro e un tubo di prolunga. probabilmemnte pur essendo a 5,6 la profondità di campo era veramente molto limitata, tanto da non avere a fuoco il secondo occhio. forse sarebbe andata bene anche così se solo la posa fosse ancora un po' più di taglio. spero di avere l'occasione di poterci riprovare. |
| sent on April 23, 2012 (10:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A selective maf convincing. Even if the other eye is not there in maf remains pleasant in the portrait itself. HELLO Una maf selettiva convincente. Anche se l'altro occhio non c'è nella maf rimane gradevole il ritratto in sè. CIAO |
user966 | sent on April 24, 2012 (1:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
X have the other eye <you had to fire a shot over the front and have a greater parallelism, so even at f16 you would have had to focus, however, is always pleasant one click, you will see that you will have other opportunities where you can experiment with different compositions X avere l'altro occhio a< fuoco dovevi fare una ripresa più frontale e avere un parallelismo maggiore,così neppure a f16 lo avresti avuto a fuoco,comunque rimane sempre uno scatto gradevole,vedrai che avrai altre occasioni dove poter sperimentare composizioni diverse |
| sent on April 24, 2012 (15:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
:-) Thanks Lorenzo but I wanted it so, only that I should emphasize more the angle! :-) grazie Lorenzo ma io lo volevo così, solo che avrei dovuto accentuare di più l'angolazione!! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |