RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Wildlife (no birds)
  4. » There's someone on the roof?

 
There's someone on the roof?...

Fauna (no Uccelli)

View gallery (4 photos)

There's someone on the roof? sent on April 01, 2012 (0:43) by Bardo. 5 comments, 905 views.

at 400mm, 1/640 f/8.0, ISO 1250, hand held.


1 person like it: Briè


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsupporter
sent on April 01, 2012 (20:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Roof that was? Where?
It seems natural oco: too contrasty and saturated


avatarjunior
sent on April 01, 2012 (23:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Latrine in the Serengeti.

It 's true, I increased the saturation on purpose because other pictures I posted here were inexplicably "pale".
Keep in mind that I was not 100 lens.

user101
avatar
sent on April 02, 2012 (18:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I do not like the cut, it's too saturated and it seems also quite mixed sharpenata on the head and legs.
omit the 'perch'.

avatarjunior
sent on April 03, 2012 (12:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I saw your site .... unattainable .....
The cut was forced because I was too close and the lens.
I am a beginner, can you explain what it is mixed?
I take too much if I ask you to take a look at my site to give me some advice?
Thanks

user101
avatar
sent on April 04, 2012 (17:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I have seen your site .... unattainable .....


thank you so much, but you're exaggerating, are far from unattainable .... believe me

I'm a beginner, can you explain what it is mixed?


mixed means unclear, undefined, detailing all 'mixed', 'stuck' ...
See how you can see the detail in the foreleg and right as it is on the head. you feel the same? behold, the one on the head is mixed.


I take too much if I ask you to take a look at my site to give me some advice?


I look at your site very happy, but for straight continues to post on the forum, you'll see that you'll receive from many different users.


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me