What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on March 09, 2015 (22:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Bello the blurred background and the beautiful espressione.Se let my opinion, maybe I would have maybe turned a bit 'to get sharp focus the second eye. Bello lo sfocato dello sfondo e bella l'espressione.Se permetti una mia opinione, io forse avrei forse chiuso un po' per avere perfettamente a fuoco anche il secondo occhio. |
| sent on March 09, 2015 (23:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Gianni Hello and thanks for the compliment and the passage. :-) You ragionissima, would not be at all a bad idea. Thanks and attention than I ever spend! Good job!
Mark Ciao Gianni e grazie per il complimento ed il passaggio. :-) Hai ragionissima, non sarebbe stata affatto una brutta idea. Grazie delle attenzioni che mi dedichi sempre! Buon lavoro!
Marco |
| sent on March 16, 2015 (1:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful portrait solar well composed
Federico hello Bel ritratto solare ben composto
Federico ciao |
| sent on March 16, 2015 (10:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Many thanks:-)
Mark Mille grazie :-)
Marco |
| sent on March 19, 2015 (15:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
beautiful portrait cheerful .....
... I do not see a lot of focus on the second eye .... (perhaps because they are short-sighted)
ahahahahah
that's nice !!
giuseppe bel ritratto allegro.....
...non vedo molto lo sfocato sul secondo occhio....(forse perchè sono miope)
ahahahahah
bello!!
giuseppe |
| sent on March 19, 2015 (16:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I do not see out of focus? :-P as well, hahaha! Actually a little 'it is, but I loved the look and so I decided to save it despite the small defect. :) Thank you very much!
Mark Non lo vedi fuori fuoco?  Meglio così, ahahah! Effettivamente un po' lo è, però mi piaceva moltissimo lo sguardo e così ho preferito salvarla nonostante il piccolo difetto. :) Grazie mille!
Marco |
| sent on March 22, 2015 (22:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
eye in focus or not I like a lot:-P occhio a fuoco o meno a me piace tantissimo |
| sent on March 23, 2015 (0:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Dear, I flatter.
Mark Gentilissimo, mi lusinghi.
Marco |
| sent on December 19, 2015 (20:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Is the second eye is just blurred, but ok the first, that's okay. I like it a lot. Blurred dream.
Hello Sergio Si il secondo occhio è appena sfocato, ma ok il primo, va bene così. A me piace tanto. Sfocato da sogno.
Ciao Sergio |
| sent on December 22, 2015 (12:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Yeah well with the pdc not face being aligned on the same focal plane was not possible to have both eyes on fire, I'm glad you like it.
Marco Si beh con quella pdc non essendo il viso allineato sullo stesso piano focale non era possibile avere entrambi gli occhi a fuoco, mi fa piacere ti piaccia.
Marco |
| sent on April 30, 2016 (19:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very beautiful !! My opinion is that the 135 should be used at full aperture, and rightly so, otherwise we might as well use a 70-200 f2.8 !!! Regards Alessio !!! ( Molto bella!! La mia opinione è che il 135 va usato a tutta apertura, giustamente, altrimenti tanto vale usare un 70-200 f2.8!!! Saluti Alessio!!!( |
| sent on May 02, 2016 (2:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
If not TA still safe in well aperture, blurred must one note '! ;-) Thanks for the positive comments, hello hello!
Marco Se non a TA comunque di sicuro a diaframma bene aperto, lo sfocato s'ha da nota'!  Grazie del commento positivo, ciao ciao!
Marco |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
