“ It recognizes the hand to the composition and the naturalness of the spouses. One would think that you have the jacket that makes invisible! ;-) „

“ is the error I commit almost all, if you believe that between spouses portraits there is harmony is due to the absence of photographer. A good portrait painter disappears, a good portrait is necessarily required in each photo. If we give carte blanche to the spontaneity of non-professionals, it would become a work of street or reportage without any common denominator.
Professional photographer, to create their own style over time, should be the common denominator so that all jobs have a footprint.
The difficulty lies mainly in bring up any situation expected, as the most spontaneous and natural as possible. How to star in a film.
Even if you prefer to give a more reportage, the presence of the photographer is always necessary, if you're shooting a film documentary on the life of a historical figure is not that the director turns a "big brother" in the house of the family. There is always a script, there is always a storyboard, there is always an actor, a technical recovery and a fitter, in short, it just changes the packaging of the final message. (In film there is nothing without a storyboard well studied, even in reality, even in the documentary about the bedbug desert, even in anything they want to spacciarvi "instinctive and natural").
Not much on focalizzerei photographer YES or NO photographer, but more about HOW photographer.
This is my philosophy. „