What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on August 09, 2014 (19:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice pose obtained. I wonder if the proboscis you with his tongue. ;-) Simpatica la posa ricavata. Chissà se con la spirotromba ti fa la linguaccia. |
| sent on August 09, 2014 (20:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I think I was keeping an eye on, when I started we had collected, then he stretched-)
as for the rest of you think? recommendations to improve the definition?
I tried to quit more, 'to f / 45, but f / 22 and I' seemed the best compromise between definition and depth 'of field.
among other things, I do not exclude even some movement, I covered the exif, were less than 24 seconds, there was only light the lamp on the ceiling:-P secondo me mi stava tenendo d'occhio, quando ho cominciato ce l'aveva raccolta, poi l'ha allungata 
per il resto come ti sembra? consigli per migliorare la definizione?
ho provato a chiudere di piu', fino a f/45, ma f/22 mi e' sembrato il miglior compromesso tra definizione e profondita' di campo.
tra l'altro non escludo nemmeno qualche movimento, ho riguardato gli exif, sono stati ben 24 secondi, ad illuminare c'era solo la lampada a soffitto  |
| sent on August 10, 2014 (16:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Assuming that in those conditions the wings you could never get it sharp even with f100 you always have to take into account the diffraction above a certain value the image may be heard even if it is not easy gl'ingrandimenti projected its visibility. The perspective chosen is the result of your liking but if you're looking for maximum sharpness would be better to get as much as possible parallel between the subject and the focal plane.
Opening the file in RAW I placed a little 'color temperature sliders and playing with the others I have improved in my opinion a little' color.
Partendo dal presupposto che in quelle condizioni le ali non avresti mai potuto ottenerle nitide nemmeno con f100 devi sempre tener conto della diffrazione che sopra a certi valori l'immagine può farsi sentire anche se con gl'ingrandimenti prospettati risulta non facile la sua visibilità. La prospettiva scelta è frutto di un tuo gradimento però se cerchi la massima nitidezza meglio sarebbe mettersi il più possibile parallelo tra soggetto e piano focale.
Aprendo il file in RAW ho sistemato un po' la temperatura colore e giocando con gl'altri cursori ho migliorato a mio avviso un po' il colore.
|
| sent on August 10, 2014 (18:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
ok thanks, if you look at my gallery I've also reloaded the same photo with the background a bit 'more' balanced and a bit of correction, so 'maybe the look and' a bit 'more' natural
www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?t=970304&l=it ok grazie, se guardi la mia galleria ho ricaricato anche io la stessa foto con il bianco un po' piu' bilanciato e un pelo di correzione, cosi' forse l'aspetto e' un po' piu' naturale
www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?t=970304&l=it |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
7.6 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
