What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 247000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on March 11, 2014 (7:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Fascinating these sunspots .. Affascinante queste macchie solari.. |
| sent on March 11, 2014 (20:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
thanks nik, the sun is a great show especially in recent months. a few weeks ago there were stains visible to the naked eye! ;) grazie nik; il sole è un grande spettacolo specie in questi ultimi mesi. qualche settimana fa c'erano macchie visibili a occhio nudo ! ;) |
| sent on March 11, 2014 (20:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I have forgotten the details of the picture: Canon 600D + Mak / Cass. 100 f/14 - 1/200 sec. 200 iso. ho dimenticato i dati della foto: Canon 600D + Mak/Cass. 100 f/14 - 1/200 sec. a 200 iso. |
| sent on March 15, 2014 (22:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice photo of the Sun with groups of spots clearly legible and beautiful clarity. Bravo, a really nice job! Can I ask why you shot the photo 90 degrees? The solar equator with spots in horizontal (for me) it would be easier to distinguish between the groups, and even more real. Whatever you've been very good! Greetings alberto Bellissima foto del Sole con i gruppi di macchie ben leggibili e belle nitide. Bravo, veramente un bel lavoro! Posso chiederti il perchè hai girato la foto di 90 gradi? L'equatore solare con le macchie in orizzontale (per me) sarebbe stato più facile per distinguere i gruppi e anche più reale. Comunque sia sei stato bravissimo !! Saluti alberto |
| sent on March 17, 2014 (22:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
hello alberto, thanks compliments :))) I do not have a real reason the x rotation of 90 °. I did not think to turn it properly, I have not evaluated this aspect perhaps x distraction, perhaps xchè overly hasty. anyway I'll try to remember to proxima also this aspect of yourself :) indicatomi is actually correct +. I must also report a defect that I see my image covering better. I wonder if others have noticed? 8-) ciao alberto, grazie dei complimenti :))) non ho un motivo vero e proprio x la rotazione di 90°. non ho pensato di ruotarla correttamente, non ho valutato quest'aspetto forse x distrazione, forse xchè eccessivamente frettoloso. ad ogni modo alla proxima cercherò di ricordarmi anche di quest'aspetto da te indicatomi :) in effetti è + corretto. devo riportare inoltre un difetto di cui mi accorgo riguardando meglio la mia immagine. chissà se altri lo hanno notato? |
| sent on March 22, 2014 (22:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I do not know if you're referring to those three small spots caused by dust particles on the sensor or on the sunscreen, but how well you say, you have to look closely to notice them. If it is this to which you allude, I do not find a large defect and your beautiful picture is not affected. Hello and Happy Sunday Non so se ti riferisci a quelle tre piccole macchie causate da granelli di polvere sul sensore o sul filtro solare, ma come ben dici, bisogna guardare attentamente per notarle. Se è questo a cui alludi, non lo trovo un gran difetto e la tua bella foto non ne risente. Ciao e Buona Domenica |
| sent on March 24, 2014 (9:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
thanks alberto, in fact just alluded to those. I'm going crazy to figure out where they are (sensor, mirror telescope, filter) x delete them: fconfuso: rather than delete them in photoshop where I should find both physically and correct the defect. soon good day to you too :) grazie alberto, in effetti alludevo proprio a quelle. sto diventando matto a capire dove siano (sensore, specchio telescopio, filtro) x poterle eliminare piuttosto che cancellarle in photoshop mi conviene trovare dove sia fisicamente il difetto e correggerlo. a presto buona giornata anche a te :) |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |