JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on February 27, 2014 (22:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Classic case with perfect focus on the back and not on the nose (you can tell by the fact that the point of light on the eye has a fairly thick). In this case, an f/11 and ISO1000 gave you still 1/1000 shutter speed with a PDC bit 'wider that fell well maybe even the head of the animal. Although I like the PDC reduced, but at least the focus should be on the eye of the subject :-). Classico caso con fuoco perfetto sulla schiena e non sul musetto (si capisce dal fatto che il punto luce sull'occhio ha un discreto spessore). In questo caso un f/11 e ISO1000 ti davano ancora 1/1000 di tempo di scatto con una PDC un po' più ampia in cui forse rientrava bene anche la testa dell'animale. Anche se a me piace la PDC ridotta, però almeno il fuoco deve stare sull'occhio del soggetto .
sent on February 27, 2014 (23:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I'm sorry, but the fire was right on the eye ... if you want I can turn over the original file .. Anyway thanks for the ride! Hello! Mi spiace,ma il fuoco era proprio sull'occhio...se vuoi posso girarti il file originale..Comunque grazie per il passaggio! Ciao!
sent on February 28, 2014 (10:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It may be that I have seen evil from the phone last night. Try to post the HD version. Hello! Può essere che abbia visto male dal cellulare ieri sera. Prova a postare la versione HD. Ciao!
sent on February 28, 2014 (10:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Alvise, you have not seen evil ... ;-) could also be due to a shake-rather than to an incorrect maf (5.6 af ... even if we should see how far it was) very often these passerines move only his head imperceptibly, with the result that the body is sharp and the head no .. 8-) Hello! Alvise, non hai visto male ... potrebbe anche essere imputabile ad un micromosso piuttosto che ad una errata maf (anche se a f 5.6...bisognerebbe vedere quanto era distante); molto spesso questi passeriformi muovono impercettibilmente solo la testa, col risultato che il corpo risulta nitido e la testa no.. Ciao!
sent on February 28, 2014 (21:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In fact it is difficult to understand without HD. The shake-out in general is different from the fire. In the out of focus points of light (such as the eye fluke) spread out evenly; small ellipses are in the shake-or at least they can be recognized in a deformation in a particular direction. Zooming in to 200% or 400 HD you might understand better. In effetti senza HD è difficile capire. Il micromosso in genere è diverso dal fuori fuoco. Nel fuori fuoco i punti luce (come quello sull'occhio della passera) si allargano uniformemente; nel micromosso sono piccole ellissi o comunque in essi è riconoscibile una deformazione in una direzione particolare. Ingrandendo al 200 o 400% l'HD si potrebbe capire meglio.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
. 
... potrebbe anche essere imputabile ad un micromosso piuttosto che ad una errata maf (anche se a f 5.6...bisognerebbe vedere quanto era distante); molto spesso questi passeriformi muovono impercettibilmente solo la testa, col risultato che il corpo risulta nitido e la testa no..